Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Aug;38(2):312-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23972. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
To assess the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) findings as an indirect marker of side-specific risk of extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer.
Fifty-one patients underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before prostatectomy. Radiologists 1 and 2 (4 and 1 years experience) assessed each side for ECE using T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and evaluated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for the presence of apparent tumor in each lobe and to measure peripheral zone ADC. A uropathologist measured the extent of any ECE.
In all, 28/102 lobes had ECE, of which 12 measured ≤1 mm, 11 measured >1 mm and ≤2 mm, and five measured >2 mm. Side-specific accuracies for detection of ECE for readers 1 and 2 were respectively: T2WI 68.6% and 74.5%; presence of apparent tumor on ADC map 66.7% and 60.8%; ADC value 75.5% and 69.6%. For ECE >2 mm, both readers achieved 100% sensitivity based on apparent tumor on ADC map or ADC values and 80% sensitivity using T2WI. For detection of ECE ≤2 mm, sensitivity for all combinations of the three methods and two readers ranged from 58.3%-81.8%, aside from assessment for ECE using T2WI by the less experienced reader, which exhibited sensitivity of 17.4%. Interreader agreement for the presence of ECE was 0.18 using T2WI, 0.37 using apparent tumor on ADC map, and 0.60 using ADC values.
Compared with T2WI, DWI had comparable accuracy for side-specific assessment of ECE, greater sensitivity for ECE <2 mm for the less-experienced radiologist, and greater interreader agreement.
评估弥散加权成像(DWI)作为前列腺癌包膜外扩展(ECE)侧特异性风险的间接标志物的效用。
51 例患者在前列腺切除术前接受了 3T 磁共振成像(MRI)检查。放射科医师 1 和 2(分别具有 4 年和 1 年的经验)使用 T2 加权成像(T2WI)评估了每侧的 ECE,并评估了每个叶的表观弥散系数(ADC)图上是否存在明显肿瘤,并测量了周围区域 ADC。泌尿科医师测量了任何 ECE 的程度。
总共 28/102 个叶有 ECE,其中 12 个测量值≤1mm,11 个测量值>1mm 且≤2mm,5 个测量值>2mm。读者 1 和 2 对 ECE 的侧特异性检测准确性分别为:T2WI 为 68.6%和 74.5%;ADC 图上存在明显肿瘤的比例为 66.7%和 60.8%;ADC 值为 75.5%和 69.6%。对于 ECE>2mm,两位读者均基于 ADC 图上的明显肿瘤或 ADC 值达到了 100%的敏感性,而使用 T2WI 则达到了 80%的敏感性。对于检测 ECE≤2mm,所有三种方法和两位读者的组合的敏感性在 58.3%-81.8%之间,除了经验较少的读者使用 T2WI 评估 ECE 时的敏感性为 17.4%。使用 T2WI 评估 ECE 时,两位读者的 ECE 存在的一致性为 0.18,使用 ADC 图上的明显肿瘤为 0.37,使用 ADC 值为 0.60。
与 T2WI 相比,DWI 对 ECE 的侧特异性评估具有相当的准确性,对于经验较少的放射科医师,对 ECE<2mm 具有更高的敏感性,并且具有更高的读者间一致性。