Departamento de Química Física, Universidad de Sevilla, c/Prof. García González, s/n. 41012 Sevilla, Spain.
Chemistry. 2013 Jan 21;19(4):1254-61. doi: 10.1002/chem.201203474. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
This paper reports a theoretical analysis of the electronic structure and magnetic properties of a tetranuclear Cu(II) complex, [Cu(4) (HL)(4)], which has a 4+2 cubane-like structure (H(3) L=N,N'-(2-hydroxypropane-1,3-diyl)bis(acetylacetoneimine)). These theoretical calculations indicate a quintet (S=2) ground state; the energy-level distribution of the magnetic states confirm Heisenberg behaviour and correspond to an S(4) spin-spin interaction model. The dominant interaction is the ferromagnetic coupling between the pseudo-dimeric units (J(1) =22.2 cm(-1)), whilst a weak and ferromagnetic interaction is found within the pseudo-dimeric units (J(2) =1.4 cm(-1)). The amplitude and sign of these interactions are consistent with the structure and arrangement of the magnetic Cu 3d orbitals; they accurately simulate the thermal dependence of magnetic susceptibility, but do not agree with the reported J values (J(1) =38.4 cm(-1), J(2) =-18.0 cm(-1)) that result from the experimental fitting. This result is not an isolated case; many other polynuclear systems, in particular 4+2 Cu(II) cubanes, have been reported in which the fitted magnetic terms are not consistent with the geometrical features of the system. In this context, theoretical evaluation can be considered as a valuable tool in the interpretation of the macroscopic behaviour, thus providing clues for a rational and directed design of new materials with specific properties.
本文报道了一种四核 Cu(II) 配合物 [Cu(4)(HL)(4)] 的电子结构和磁性的理论分析,该配合物具有 4+2 立方烷类似结构(H(3)L=N,N'-(2-羟基丙烷-1,3-二基)双(乙酰丙酮亚胺))。这些理论计算表明其基态为 quintet(S=2);磁态的能级分布证实了海森堡行为,对应于 S(4)自旋-自旋相互作用模型。主要相互作用是准二聚体单元之间的铁磁耦合(J(1)=22.2 cm(-1)),而在准二聚体单元内发现了较弱的铁磁相互作用(J(2)=1.4 cm(-1))。这些相互作用的幅度和符号与磁性 Cu 3d 轨道的结构和排列一致;它们准确模拟了磁化率的热依赖性,但与实验拟合得到的报告 J 值(J(1)=38.4 cm(-1),J(2)=-18.0 cm(-1))不一致。这一结果并非孤立现象;许多其他多核体系,特别是 4+2 Cu(II) 立方烷,已经被报道,其拟合的磁性项与体系的几何特征不一致。在这种情况下,理论评估可以被视为解释宏观行为的一种有价值的工具,从而为具有特定性质的新材料的合理和有针对性的设计提供线索。