• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医学研究数据库及相关癌症登记处中的癌症记录和死亡率。

Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries.

机构信息

Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):168-75. doi: 10.1002/pds.3374. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1002/pds.3374
PMID:23239282
Abstract

PURPOSE

Large electronic datasets are increasingly being used to evaluate healthcare delivery. The aim of this study was to compare information held by cancer registries with that of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD).

METHODS

A convenience sample of 101 020 patients aged 40+ years drawn from GPRD formed the primary data source. This cohort was derived from a larger sample originally established for a cohort study of diabetes. GPRD records were linked with those from cancer registries in the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR). Concordance between the two datasets was then evaluated. For cases recorded only on one dataset, validation was sought from other datasets (Hospital Episode Statistics and death registration) and by detailed analysis of a subset of GPRD records.

RESULTS

A total of 5797 cancers (excluding non-melanomatous skin cancer) were recorded on GPRD. Of these cases, 4830 were also recorded on NCDR (concordance rate of 83.3%). Of the 976 cases recorded on GPRD but not on NCDR, 528 were present also in the hospital records or death certificates. Of the 341 cases recorded on NCDR but not on GPRD, 307 were recorded in these other two datasets. Rates of concordance varied by cancer type. Cancer registries recorded larger numbers of patients with lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers, whereas GPRD recorded more haematological cancers and melanomas. As expected, GPRD recorded significantly more non-melanomatous skin cancer. Concordance decreased with increasing age.

CONCLUSION

Although concordance levels were reasonably high, the findings from this study can be used to direct efforts for better recording in both datasets.

摘要

目的

越来越多的大型电子数据集被用于评估医疗保健服务的提供情况。本研究旨在比较癌症登记处和普通实践研究数据库(GPRD)所掌握的信息。

方法

从 GPRD 中抽取一个方便样本,共 101020 名年龄在 40 岁以上的患者,作为原始数据来源。该队列源自一项更大的糖尿病队列研究的原始样本。将 GPRD 记录与国家癌症数据存储库(NCDR)中的癌症登记处记录相链接,然后评估两个数据集之间的一致性。对于仅在一个数据集上记录的病例,从其他数据集(医院入院统计和死亡登记)以及对 GPRD 记录的一个子集进行详细分析来寻求验证。

结果

GPRD 共记录了 5797 例(不包括非黑素瘤性皮肤癌)癌症。其中,4830 例也记录在 NCDR 中(一致性率为 83.3%)。在 GPRD 记录但未在 NCDR 记录的 976 例病例中,528 例也存在于医院记录或死亡证明中。在 NCDR 记录但未在 GPRD 记录的 341 例病例中,307 例记录在其他两个数据集。癌症类型的一致性率有所不同。癌症登记处记录了更多的肺癌、结直肠癌和胰腺癌患者,而 GPRD 记录了更多的血液系统癌症和黑色素瘤。不出所料,GPRD 记录了更多的非黑素瘤性皮肤癌。一致性随着年龄的增加而降低。

结论

尽管一致性水平相当高,但本研究的结果可用于指导两个数据集更好地记录的努力。

相似文献

1
Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries.全科医学研究数据库及相关癌症登记处中的癌症记录和死亡率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):168-75. doi: 10.1002/pds.3374. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
2
Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study.在英格兰,与癌症登记处关联的初级保健数据库中癌症诊断的有效性。基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;36(5):425-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
3
Identification of esophageal cancer in the General Practice Research Database.在全科医学研究数据库中识别食管癌。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):1159-67. doi: 10.1002/pds.2249. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
4
Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics.地区癌症登记处及医院病历统计中的种族编码
BMC Public Health. 2006 Nov 10;6:281. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-281.
5
Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review.全科医学研究数据库中诊断编码的有效性:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Mar;60(572):e128-36. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483562.
6
Colorectal cancer incidence on the General Practice Research Database.全科医疗研究数据库中的结直肠癌发病率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):775-783. doi: 10.1002/pds.3236. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
7
Cancer recording in patients with and without type 2 diabetes in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink primary care data and linked hospital admission data: a cohort study.在临床实践研究数据库初级保健数据和相关住院数据中,记录有 2 型糖尿病和无 2 型糖尿病患者的癌症情况:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 26;8(5):e020827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020827.
8
Linking data from hospital and cancer registry databases: should this be standard practice?医院和癌症登记数据库的数据链接:这是否应该成为标准做法?
Intern Med J. 2010 Aug;40(8):566-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01984.x. Epub 2009 May 21.
9
Evaluation of the General Practice Research Database congenital heart defects prevalence: comparison to United Kingdom national systems.全科医疗研究数据库中先天性心脏病患病率的评估:与英国国家系统的比较。
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007 Apr;79(4):309-16. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20356.
10
Concordance and timing in recording cancer events in primary care, hospital and mortality records for patients with and without psoriasis: A population-based cohort study.在初级保健、医院和死亡率记录中记录癌症事件的一致性和时间,对于有和没有银屑病的患者:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 19;16(7):e0254661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254661. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
CohortDiagnostics: Phenotype evaluation across a network of observational data sources using population-level characterization.队列诊断:使用人群水平特征在观察性数据源网络中进行表型评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):e0310634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310634. eCollection 2025.
2
A UK population-based case-control study of blood tests before cancer diagnosis in patients with non-specific abdominal symptoms.一项基于英国人群的病例对照研究,研究对象为有非特异性腹部症状的患者在癌症诊断前的血液检查情况。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Mar;132(5):450-461. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02936-9. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
3
Five-alpha reductase inhibitors and risk of prostate cancer among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A historical cohort study using primary care data.
5α还原酶抑制剂与良性前列腺增生男性患前列腺癌的风险:一项利用初级保健数据的历史性队列研究。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Jul 11;8:295. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19566.1. eCollection 2023.
4
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the risk of skin cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes: a UK population-based cohort study.二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂与 2 型糖尿病患者皮肤癌风险的关系:一项基于英国人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2023 Nov;11(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003550.
5
5α-Reductase Inhibitors and Risk of Kidney and Bladder Cancers in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Population-Based Cohort Study.5α-还原酶抑制剂与良性前列腺增生男性的肾和膀胱癌风险:基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Mar 6;32(3):428-434. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1109.
6
Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂与胰腺癌风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e026789. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026789. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
7
Birth and death notification via mobile devices: a mixed methods systematic review.通过移动设备发送出生和死亡通知:一项混合方法系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 16;7(7):CD012909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012909.pub2.
8
Guideline interval: A new time interval in the diagnostic pathway for symptomatic cancer.建议间隔时间:症状性癌症诊断路径中的新时间间隔。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;73:101969. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101969. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
9
Thiazolidinediones and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Cohort Study.噻唑烷二酮类药物和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与非酒精性脂肪性肝病的风险:一项队列研究。
Hepatology. 2021 Nov;74(5):2467-2477. doi: 10.1002/hep.32012. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
10
Data-driven identification of ageing-related diseases from electronic health records.从电子健康记录中挖掘与年龄相关疾病的数据驱动方法
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2938. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82459-y.