• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者安全与外科创新的传播:全国范围内腹腔镜部分肾切除术的分析。

Patient safety and the diffusion of surgical innovations: a national analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

机构信息

Division of Urology, UC San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1674-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2655-z. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-012-2655-z
PMID:23239306
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are scant data on patient safety and the national diffusion of surgical innovations. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) provides an apt model for population-based analyses of patient safety and the propagation of complex surgical innovations.

METHODS

In the nationwide inpatient sample, we identified patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal tumors from 1998 to 2009 and utilized patient safety indicators (PSI) to measure preventable adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the cases, 68,713 (87 %) were OPN and 9,842 (13 %) were LPN. The prevalence of LPN increased more than threefold from 2006 to 2009. Compared to open partial nephrectomy (OPN), LPN patients were more likely to be younger (p = 0.022), have lower Charlson comorbidity scores (p = 0.002), and undergo surgery at urban (p < 0.001) and teaching (p = 0.02) hospitals. On multivariate analysis, LPN was associated with a 28 % decreased probability of any PSI (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 0.72, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.96, p = 0.025), although this benefit did not attain significance when comparing robot-assisted LPN to OPN (ORadj 0.72, 95 % CI 0.44-1.16, p = 0.173). Overall mortality decreased from 0.9 % in 1998 to 0.1 % in 2009 (p < 0.001). There were no differences in adjusted mortality between LPN and OPN (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

During its initial national diffusion, LPN resulted in enhanced perioperative patient safety compared to OPN. Mortality for both LPN and OPN decreased over time. Further study is needed to elucidate and promote factors contributing to the safe diffusion of complex surgical innovations.

摘要

背景

关于患者安全和外科创新在全国范围内的推广,相关数据很少。腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)为基于人群的患者安全分析和复杂外科创新的传播提供了一个很好的模型。

方法

在全国住院患者样本中,我们从 1998 年到 2009 年确定了接受肾肿瘤部分肾切除术的患者,并利用患者安全指标(PSI)来衡量可预防的不良结果。

结果

在这些病例中,68713 例(87%)为开放式部分肾切除术(OPN),9842 例(13%)为腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)。LPN 的患病率从 2006 年到 2009 年增加了两倍多。与开放式部分肾切除术(OPN)相比,LPN 患者更年轻(p = 0.022),Charlson 合并症评分较低(p = 0.002),并且在城市(p < 0.001)和教学医院(p = 0.02)接受手术。多变量分析显示,LPN 与任何 PSI 的概率降低 28%(调整后的优势比 [ORadj] 0.72,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.55-0.96,p = 0.025)相关,尽管在比较机器人辅助 LPN 与 OPN 时,这种益处并未达到显著水平(ORadj 0.72,95%CI 0.44-1.16,p = 0.173)。总死亡率从 1998 年的 0.9%降至 2009 年的 0.1%(p < 0.001)。LPN 和 OPN 之间的调整死亡率没有差异(p = 0.75)。

结论

在其最初的全国推广过程中,与 OPN 相比,LPN 导致围手术期患者安全性提高。LPN 和 OPN 的死亡率随时间推移而降低。需要进一步研究阐明和促进促进复杂外科创新安全传播的因素。

相似文献

1
Patient safety and the diffusion of surgical innovations: a national analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.患者安全与外科创新的传播:全国范围内腹腔镜部分肾切除术的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1674-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2655-z. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
2
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: comparison of complication rates in elderly patients during the initial phase of adoption.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术与腹腔镜或开放性部分肾切除术治疗 T1 期肾细胞癌:在采用初期老年患者并发症发生率的比较。
Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.050.
3
Propensity-score matched comparison of complications, blood transfusions, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality between open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a national series.开放性与腹腔镜肾部分切除术的并发症、输血、住院时间和院内死亡率的倾向评分匹配比较:一项全国性系列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;38(1):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.09.035. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:200例配对患者的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
5
Inpatient safety trends in laparoscopic and open nephrectomy for renal tumours.腹腔镜和开放性肾切除术治疗肾肿瘤的住院患者安全性趋势。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1808-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11071.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
6
The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer.肾细胞癌患者术后并发症与住院结局和费用的关系。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):580-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11122.x. Epub 2012 May 7.
7
Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy provides better operative outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches: results from a prospective cohort study.与腹腔镜和开放手术方法相比,机器人辅助部分肾切除术可提供更好的手术效果:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2017 Sep;11(3):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0660-2. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
8
Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: no impact of surgical approach on perioperative complications and long-term postoperative quality of life.临床T1期肾肿块的腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:手术方式对围手术期并发症及术后长期生活质量无影响。
World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):421-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1318-1. Epub 2014 May 31.
9
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience.连续患者中行腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:康奈尔大学的经验
BJU Int. 2005 Oct;96(6):811-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05718.x.
10
Lower Incidence of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Than in Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.机器人辅助部分肾切除术术后急性肾损伤发生率低于开放部分肾切除术:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Endourol. 2020 Jul;34(7):754-762. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0622. Epub 2020 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary techniques and outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道的当代技术与结果
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2216-2232. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.45.
2
The evaluation of pulmonary function and blood gas analysis in patients submitted to laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy.接受腹腔镜与开放性肾切除术患者的肺功能评估及血气分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Nov-Dec;41(6):1202-8. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0040.
3
Open partial nephrectomy: ancient art or currently available technique?

本文引用的文献

1
The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States.美国首次全国机器人手术结果和趋势调查。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jul;215(1):107-14; discussion 114-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 May 4.
2
Inpatient safety trends in laparoscopic and open nephrectomy for renal tumours.腹腔镜和开放性肾切除术治疗肾肿瘤的住院患者安全性趋势。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1808-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11071.x. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
3
National trends in the use of partial nephrectomy: a rising tide that has not lifted all boats.
开放性部分肾切除术:古老技艺还是现代可用技术?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Dec;47(12):1923-32. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1120-z. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
4
The learning curve and factors affecting warm ischemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术的学习曲线及影响热缺血时间的因素
Indian J Urol. 2015 Jul-Sep;31(3):223-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.156916.
5
Evaluation of national trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy in relation to the publication of the American Urologic Association guidelines for the management of clinical T1 renal masses.评估与美国泌尿外科学会临床T1期肾肿块管理指南发布相关的部分肾切除术使用的全国趋势。
BMC Urol. 2014 Dec 17;14:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-101.
6
The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.腹腔镜检查的普及率与患者安全结局:一项结直肠切除术分析
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):608-16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3216-9. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
7
Migration of a Hem-o-Lok Clip to the Ureter Following Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Presenting With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.腹腔镜部分肾切除术后 Hem-o-Lok 夹迁移至输尿管并出现下尿路症状。
Int Neurourol J. 2013 Jun;17(2):90-2. doi: 10.5213/inj.2013.17.2.90. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
8
Diffusion of robotics into clinical practice in the United States: process, patient safety, learning curves, and the public health.机器人技术在美国临床实践中的扩散:过程、患者安全、学习曲线和公共卫生。
World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):455-61. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-1015-x. Epub 2012 Dec 29.
全国范围内部分肾切除术的应用趋势:水涨船高,但并非所有船只都受益。
J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.173. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
4
Is robotic technology facilitating the minimally invasive approach to partial nephrectomy?机器人技术是否有助于微创部分肾切除术?
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(5):760-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10549.x. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
5
The battle of the sexes: women win out in gastrointestinal surgery.性别之战:女性在胃肠外科手术中胜出。
J Surg Res. 2011 Sep;170(1):e23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.04.017. Epub 2011 May 6.
6
Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass.临床T1期肾肿块管理指南
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
7
Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons.机器人泌尿外科手术的培训、认证、监考及法医学风险:泌尿外科机器人外科医生学会的建议
J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.042. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
8
Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:200例配对患者的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
9
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for central tumors: analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications.腹腔镜下中央型肿瘤肾部分切除术:围手术期结果及并发症分析
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):42-7; discussion 47. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.014. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
10
Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after 60 cases: comparison with open partial nephrectomy.60例手辅助腹腔镜下肾部分切除术后:与开放性肾部分切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2009 May;23(5):1075-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0135-2. Epub 2008 Oct 2.