Thikkurissy S, Crawford Bethany, Groner Judith, Stewart Roderick, Smiley Megann K
The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, OH, USA.
Anesth Prog. 2012 Winter;59(4):143-6. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.4.143.
The purpose of this study was to test the null hypothesis that children with environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure (also known as passive smoke exposure) do not demonstrate an increased likelihood of adverse respiratory events during or while recovering from general anesthesia administered for treatment of early childhood caries. Parents of children (ages 19 months-12 years) preparing to receive general anesthesia for the purpose of dental restorative procedures were interviewed regarding the child's risk for ETS. Children were observed during and after the procedure by a standardized dentist anesthesiologist and postanesthesia care unit nurse who independently recorded severity of 6 types of adverse respiratory events-coughing, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, breath holding, hypersecretion, and airway obstruction. Data from 99 children were analyzed. The children for whom ETS was reported were significantly older than their ETS-free counterparts (P = .03). If the primary caregiver smoked, there was a significantly higher incidence of smoking by other members of the family (P < .0001) as well as smoking in the house (P < .0005). There were no significant differences between the adverse respiratory outcomes of the ETS (+) and ETS (-) groups. The ETS (+) children did have significantly longer recovery times (P < .0001) despite not having significantly more dental caries (P = .38) or longer procedure times. ETS is a poor indicator of post-general anesthesia respiratory morbidity in children being treated for early childhood caries.
本研究的目的是检验零假设,即暴露于环境烟草烟雾(ETS,也称为被动吸烟)的儿童在接受全身麻醉治疗幼儿龋齿期间或恢复过程中,出现不良呼吸事件的可能性不会增加。对准备接受牙科修复手术全身麻醉的儿童(19个月至12岁)的父母就其孩子暴露于环境烟草烟雾的风险进行了访谈。在手术期间和术后,由一名标准化的牙医麻醉师和麻醉后护理单元护士对儿童进行观察,他们独立记录6种不良呼吸事件的严重程度——咳嗽、喉痉挛、支气管痉挛、屏气、分泌过多和气道阻塞。对99名儿童的数据进行了分析。报告有环境烟草烟雾暴露的儿童比无暴露的儿童年龄显著更大(P = 0.03)。如果主要照顾者吸烟,家庭其他成员吸烟的发生率显著更高(P < 0.0001),家中吸烟的情况也是如此(P < 0.0005)。环境烟草烟雾暴露组(ETS(+))和非暴露组(ETS(-))的不良呼吸结果之间没有显著差异。尽管环境烟草烟雾暴露组的儿童龋齿数量没有显著更多(P = 0.38),手术时间也没有显著更长,但他们的恢复时间确实显著更长(P < 0.0001)。环境烟草烟雾暴露并不是接受幼儿龋齿治疗的儿童全身麻醉后呼吸并发症的一个良好指标。