Barkam Corinna, Kamal Haytham, Dammann Elke, Diedrich Helmut, Buchholz Stefanie, Eder Matthias, Krauter Jürgen, Ganser Arnold, Stadler Michael
Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Bone Marrow Res. 2012;2012:874601. doi: 10.1155/2012/874601. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
Valganciclovir (VGC), an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), has been shown to clear cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in preemptive treatment of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), apparently without significant toxicity. Since VGC obviates hospitalization, it is increasingly being adopted, although not approved, in alloHSCT. When we retrospectively evaluated preemptive treatment with VGC versus GCV, foscarnet or cidofovir, in all 312 consecutive CMV viremias of 169 patients allotransplanted at our institution between 1996 and 2006, we found VGC more efficacious (79%) than non-VGC therapies (69%). The advantage of outpatient VGC, however, was outbalanced by more profound neutropenias (including two cases of agranulocytosis, one with graft loss) requiring subsequent prolonged rehospitalization. Thus, in a second, prospective cohort from 2007 to 2011 (all 202 consecutive CMV viremias of 118 yet older and sicker patients), we implemented twice weekly neutrophil monitoring during outpatient VGC treatment and avoided VGC maintenance therapy. While conserving efficacy (VGC 71%, non-VGC 72%), we could now demonstrate a reduced mean duration of hospitalization with VGC (9 days (0-66)) compared to non-VGC (25 days (0-115)), without any agranulocytosis episodes. We conclude that safe outpatient VGC therapy is possible in alloHSCT recipients, but requires frequent monitoring to prevent severe myelotoxicity.
缬更昔洛韦(VGC)是更昔洛韦(GCV)的口服前体药物,已被证明在异基因造血干细胞移植(alloHSCT)后对患者进行抢先治疗时可清除巨细胞病毒(CMV)病毒血症,且显然无明显毒性。由于VGC无需住院治疗,因此在alloHSCT中越来越多地被采用,尽管尚未获得批准。当我们回顾性评估1996年至2006年间在我们机构接受同种异体移植的169例患者的312次连续性CMV病毒血症中,VGC与GCV、膦甲酸钠或西多福韦的抢先治疗时,我们发现VGC比非VGC疗法(69%)更有效(79%)。然而,门诊使用VGC的优势被更严重的中性粒细胞减少症(包括2例粒细胞缺乏症,1例伴有移植物丢失)所抵消,这需要随后延长住院时间。因此,在2007年至2011年的第二个前瞻性队列中(118例年龄更大、病情更重的患者的所有202次连续性CMV病毒血症),我们在门诊VGC治疗期间每周进行两次中性粒细胞监测,并避免了VGC维持治疗。在保持疗效(VGC为71%,非VGC为72%)的同时,我们现在可以证明与非VGC(25天(0 - 115))相比,VGC可缩短平均住院时间(9天(0 - 66)),且无任何粒细胞缺乏症发作。我们得出结论,alloHSCT受者进行安全的门诊VGC治疗是可行的,但需要频繁监测以预防严重的骨髓毒性。