School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Pharmacy Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Jun;60(6):727-739. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00982-z. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
Ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (VGCV) are the first-line agents used to prevent and treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) patients.
The aim of this work was to describe available data for the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of GCV and VGCV and the potential of a therapeutic drug monitoring strategy to improve outcomes in the alloHCT population.
We systematically reviewed the pharmacokinetics (dose-exposure), pharmacodynamics (exposure-efficacy) and toxicodynamics (exposure-toxicity) of GCV and VGCV in alloHCT patients with CMV infection. Studies including alloHCT patients treated for CMV infection reporting the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of GCV or VGCV were searched for using the PUBMED and EMBASE databases from 1946 to 2019. Only studies involving participants > 12 years of age and available in the English language were included.
A total of 179 patients were included in the 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria, of which 6 examined GCV pharmacokinetics only, while 8 also examined GCV pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics. Reported pharmacokinetic parameters showed considerable interpatient variability and were different from other populations, such as solid organ transplant and human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Only one study found a correlation between neutropenia and elevated peak and trough GCV concentrations, with no other significant pharmacodynamic and toxicodynamic relationships identified. While therapeutic drug monitoring of GCV is performed in some institutions, no association between GCV therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical outcomes was identified.
Further studies of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of GCV/VGCV in alloHCT patients are required to identify a more robust therapeutic range and to subsequently quantify the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring of GCV/VGCV in the alloHCT population.
更昔洛韦(GCV)和缬更昔洛韦(VGCV)是预防和治疗异基因造血干细胞移植(alloHCT)患者巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的一线药物。
本研究旨在描述 GCV 和 VGCV 的临床药代动力学、药效学和毒代动力学数据,以及治疗药物监测策略在 alloHCT 人群中改善结局的潜力。
我们系统地综述了 GCV 和 VGCV 在 alloHCT 合并 CMV 感染患者中的药代动力学(剂量-暴露)、药效学(暴露-疗效)和毒代动力学(暴露-毒性)。使用 PUBMED 和 EMBASE 数据库,从 1946 年到 2019 年,检索了包括 alloHCT 患者治疗 CMV 感染的报告 GCV 或 VGCV 药代动力学、药效学和毒代动力学的研究。仅纳入参与者年龄>12 岁且为英文发表的研究。
符合纳入标准的 14 项研究共纳入 179 例患者,其中 6 项仅研究了 GCV 的药代动力学,8 项同时研究了 GCV 的药效学和毒代动力学。报告的药代动力学参数显示出相当大的个体间变异性,与其他人群(如实体器官移植和人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者)不同。仅有一项研究发现中性粒细胞减少与 GCV 峰浓度和谷浓度升高有关,未发现其他显著的药效学和毒代动力学关系。虽然一些机构对 GCV 进行了治疗药物监测,但未发现 GCV 治疗药物监测与临床结局之间的关联。
需要进一步研究 alloHCT 患者 GCV/VGCV 的药代动力学、药效学和毒代动力学,以确定更稳健的治疗范围,并随后量化 alloHCT 人群中 GCV/VGCV 治疗药物监测的潜在价值。