中国医改中筹资公平性的新证据——来自中国甘肃省的案例研究。

New evidence on financing equity in China's health care reform--a case study on Gansu province, China.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, P.O. Box 187, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai 200032, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 18;12:466. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-466.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the transition from a planned economy to a market-oriented economy, China's state funding for health care declined and traditional coverage plans collapsed, leaving China's poor exposed to potentially ruinous health care costs. In reforming health care for the 21st century, equity in health care financing has become a major policy goal. To assess progress towards this goal, this paper examines the equity characteristics of health care financing in a province of northwestern China, comparing the equity performance between urban and rural areas at two different points in time.

METHODS

Analysis of whether health care financing contributions were progressive according to income were made using the Kakwani index for each of the four health care financing channels of general taxes, public and private health insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. Two rounds of surveys were conducted, the first in 2003 (13,619 individuals in 3946 households) and the second in 2008 (12,973 individuals in 3958 households). Household socio-economic, health care payment, and utilization information were recorded in household interviews.

RESULTS

Low-income households have undertaken a larger share of the health care financing burden in recent years, reflected by negative Kakwani indices, which indicate a regressive system. We found that the indices for general taxation were -0.0024 (urban) and -0.0281 (rural) in 2002, and -0.0177 (urban) and -0.0097 (rural) in 2007. Public health insurance presented different financing distributions in urban and rural areas (urban: 0.0742 in 2002, 0.0661 in 2007; rural: -0.0615 in 2002,-0.1436 in 2007.). Out-of-pocket payments were progressive but not equitable. Public health insurance coverage has expanded but financing equity has decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care financing policies in China need ongoing reform. Given the inequity of general consumption taxes, elimination of these would improve financing equity considerably. Optimizing benefit packages in public health insurance is as important as expanding coverage, both for health care financing and for utilization management as well. Although they are progressive, out-of-pocket payments are not equitable in China and have the effect of excluding the poor from health care as they cannot afford to pay for medical care and so withdraw from treatment.

摘要

背景

在从计划经济向市场经济的转型过程中,中国对医疗保健的国家资金投入减少,传统的覆盖计划崩溃,使中国的贫困人口面临潜在的灾难性医疗费用。在为 21 世纪改革医疗保健方面,医疗保健筹资公平已成为主要政策目标。为了评估实现这一目标的进展情况,本文研究了中国西北地区一个省份的医疗保健筹资公平性特征,比较了两个不同时间点城乡地区的筹资公平绩效。

方法

使用 Kakwani 指数对一般税收、公共和私人医疗保险以及自付费用这四个医疗保健筹资渠道的收入情况进行了分析,以评估医疗保健筹资贡献是否具有累进性。进行了两轮调查,第一轮于 2003 年进行(3946 户家庭中的 13619 人),第二轮于 2008 年进行(3958 户家庭中的 12973 人)。家庭社会经济、医疗保健支付和利用信息是通过家庭访谈记录的。

结果

近年来,低收入家庭承担了更大的医疗保健筹资负担,反映在负的 Kakwani 指数上,表明这是一个倒退的制度。我们发现,2002 年一般税收的指数为-0.0024(城市)和-0.0281(农村),2007 年为-0.0177(城市)和-0.0097(农村)。公共医疗保险在城市和农村地区呈现出不同的筹资分配(城市:2002 年为 0.0742,2007 年为 0.0661;农村:2002 年为-0.0615,2007 年为-0.1436)。自付费用是累进的,但不公平。公共医疗保险覆盖面扩大,但筹资公平性下降。

结论

中国的医疗保健筹资政策需要不断改革。鉴于一般消费税的不公平性,取消这些税将大大提高筹资公平性。优化公共医疗保险的福利计划与扩大覆盖面一样重要,这既是为了医疗保健筹资,也是为了利用管理。尽管自付费用在中国是累进的,但并不公平,因为它们使贫困人口无法负担医疗费用,从而无法获得医疗保健,因此退出治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1799/3562140/444402c728b1/1472-6963-12-466-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索