Suppr超能文献

推进全民健康覆盖进程中改善中国医疗卫生筹资公平性

Improving equity in health care financing in China during the progression towards Universal Health Coverage.

机构信息

School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, 101Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211166, People's Republic of China.

Institute of Healthy Jiangsu Construction & Development, Nanjing, 211166, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):852. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2798-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

China is reforming the way it finances health care as it moves towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) after the failure of market-oriented mechanisms for health care. Improving financing equity is a major policy goal of health care system during the progression towards universal coverage.

METHODS

We used progressivity analysis and dominance test to evaluate the financing channels of general taxation, pubic health insurance, and out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. In 2012 a survey of 8854 individuals in 3008 households recorded the socioeconomic and demographic status, and health care payments of those households.

RESULTS

The overall Kakwani index (KI) of China's health care financing system is 0.0444. For general tax KI was -0.0241 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.0315 to -0.0166). The indices for public health schemes (Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance, Urban Resident's Basic Medical Insurance, New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme) were respectively 0.1301 (95% CI: 0.1008 to 0.1594), -0.1737 (95% CI: -0.2166 to -0.1308), and -0.5598 (95% CI: -0.5830 to -0.5365); and for OOP payments KI was 0.0896 (95%CI: 0.0345 to 0.1447). OOP payments are still the dominant part of China's health care finance system.

CONCLUSION

China's health care financing system is not really equitable. Reducing the proportion of indirect taxes would considerably improve health care financing equity. The flat-rate contribution mechanism is not recommended for use in public health insurance schemes, and more attention should be given to optimizing benefit packages during China's progression towards UHC.

摘要

背景

在中国向全民健康覆盖迈进的过程中,由于医疗保健的市场化机制失败,中国正在改革其医疗保健融资方式。提高融资公平性是医疗保健系统在向全民覆盖迈进过程中的主要政策目标。

方法

我们使用累进性分析和优势测试来评估一般税收、公共健康保险和自付(OOP)支付的融资渠道。2012 年,对 3008 户家庭中的 8854 名个人进行了一项调查,记录了这些家庭的社会经济和人口统计状况以及医疗保健支付情况。

结果

中国医疗保健融资系统的总体 Kakwani 指数(KI)为 0.0444。对于一般税收,KI 为-0.0241(95%置信区间(CI):-0.0315 至-0.0166)。公共健康计划(城镇职工基本医疗保险、城镇居民基本医疗保险、新型农村合作医疗制度)的指数分别为 0.1301(95% CI:0.1008 至 0.1594)、-0.1737(95% CI:-0.2166 至-0.1308)和-0.5598(95% CI:-0.5830 至-0.5365);而 OOP 支付的 KI 为 0.0896(95%CI:0.0345 至 0.1447)。OOP 支付仍然是中国医疗保健融资系统的主要部分。

结论

中国的医疗保健融资系统并不真正公平。降低间接税的比例将极大地提高医疗保健融资的公平性。定额缴款机制不建议用于公共健康保险计划,在向全民健康覆盖迈进的过程中,应更加关注优化福利套餐。

相似文献

3
Who pays for health care in China? The case of Heilongjiang province.在中国谁为医疗保健买单?以黑龙江省为例。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 1;9(10):e108867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108867. eCollection 2014.
9
The progressivity of health-care financing in Kenya.肯尼亚医疗保健筹资的累进性。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Oct;29(7):912-20. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt073. Epub 2013 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Health inequities: evaluation of two paradigms.
Health Soc Work. 2010 Nov;35(4):249-56. doi: 10.1093/hsw/35.4.249.
4
Health systems financing and the path to universal coverage.卫生系统筹资与全民覆盖之路。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):402. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.078741.
5
Calculating the concentration index when income is grouped.当收入分组时计算集中指数。
J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
6
Health economics in China. Foreword.中国的卫生经济学。前言。
Health Econ. 2009 Jul;18 Suppl 2:S1-2. doi: 10.1002/hec.1516.
8
Launch of the health-care reform plan in China.中国医疗改革计划的启动。
Lancet. 2009 Apr 18;373(9672):1322-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60753-4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验