Redondo Ana, Sáez Mercedes, Oliva Patricia, Soler Maria, Arias Antoni
Iasist SAU, Barcelona, España.
Gac Sanit. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):258-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
To describe variability in the cesarean ratio and indications for this procedure in women with and without a previous cesarean section.
We conducted a cross-sectional study of 111 hospitals (year 2010) categorized in six levels. Ten groups of indications for cesarean section were developed. Measures of central tendency and diversity were used to determine variability and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons among hospital levels.
The percentage of cesarean sections was 25.4%. In women without a previous cesarean section, the percentage was higher in private and public hospitals with a lower technological level (34.7% and 30.4% in private and 22.4% in lower level public hospitals). Among public hospital levels, no differences in the percentage of cesarean sections indicated were observed.
Research on non-clinical factors could clarify the differences in the ratio of cesarean sections in private hospitals compared with public hospitals and among distinct levels of public hospitals.
描述有或无剖宫产史的女性剖宫产率及剖宫产指征的差异。
我们对2010年的111家分为六个等级的医院进行了横断面研究。制定了十组剖宫产指征。采用集中趋势和离散度测量方法来确定差异,并使用Kruskal-Wallis检验对医院等级之间进行比较。
剖宫产率为25.4%。在无剖宫产史的女性中,技术水平较低的私立和公立医院的剖宫产率较高(私立医院为34.7%,公立医院为30.4%,较低水平的公立医院为22.4%)。在公立医院等级之间,未观察到剖宫产率的差异。
对非临床因素的研究可以阐明私立医院与公立医院以及不同等级公立医院之间剖宫产率差异的原因。