Escuriet Ramón, Pueyo María, Biescas Herminia, Colls Cristina, Espiga Isabel, White Joanna, Espada Xavi, Fusté Josep, Ortún Vicente
Directorate-General for Health Planning and Research, Ministry of Health of the Government of Catalonia, Pompeu Fabra University, Travessera de les Corts, 131-159, Pavelló Ave Maria, Barcelona, 08028, Spain.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Apr 15;14:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-143.
Childbirth assistance in highly technological settings and existing variability in the interventions performed are cause for concern. In recent years, numerous recommendations have been made concerning the importance of the physiological process during birth. In Spain and Catalonia, work has been carried out to implement evidence-based practices for childbirth and to reduce unnecessary interventions.To identify obstetric intervention rates among all births, determine whether there are differences in interventions among full-term single births taking place in different hospitals according to type of funding and volume of births attended to, and to ascertain whether there is an association between caesarean section or instrumental birth rates and type of funding, the volume of births attended to and women's age.
Cross-sectional study, taking the hospital as the unit of analysis, obstetric interventions as dependent variables, and type of funding, volume of births attended to and maternal age as explanatory variables. The analysis was performed in three phases considering all births reported in the MBDS Catalonia 2011 (7,8570 births), full-term single births and births coded as normal.
The overall caesarean section rate in Catalonia is 27.55% (CI 27.23 to 27.86). There is a significant difference in caesarean section rates between public and private hospitals in all strata. Both public and private hospitals with a lower volume of births have higher obstetric intervention rates than other hospitals (49.43%, CI 48.04 to 50.81).
In hospitals in Catalonia, both the type of funding and volume of births attended to have a significant effect on the incidence of caesarean section, and type of funding is associated with the use of instruments during delivery.
在高科技环境下的分娩协助以及所实施干预措施中存在的现有差异令人担忧。近年来,针对分娩过程中生理过程的重要性提出了许多建议。在西班牙和加泰罗尼亚,已开展工作以实施基于证据的分娩实践并减少不必要的干预措施。为了确定所有分娩中的产科干预率,根据资金类型和接生量确定在不同医院进行的足月单胎分娩之间的干预措施是否存在差异,并确定剖宫产或器械助产率与资金类型、接生量和产妇年龄之间是否存在关联。
横断面研究,以医院为分析单位,产科干预措施为因变量,资金类型、接生量和产妇年龄为解释变量。分析分三个阶段进行,考虑了2011年加泰罗尼亚MBDS报告的所有分娩(78570例分娩)、足月单胎分娩以及编码为正常的分娩。
加泰罗尼亚的总体剖宫产率为27.55%(置信区间27.23至27.86)。在所有分层中,公立医院和私立医院的剖宫产率存在显著差异。接生量较低的公立医院和私立医院的产科干预率均高于其他医院(49.43%,置信区间48.04至50.81)。
在加泰罗尼亚的医院中,资金类型和接生量对剖宫产发生率均有显著影响,且资金类型与分娩时器械的使用有关。