Clinical Trial Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Spinal Cord. 2013 Apr;51(4):306-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.164. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
Retrospective analysis.
To investigate the urodynamic effects of solifenacin treatment for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Paraplegic center in Switzerland.
Retrospective analysis of case histories and urodynamic data of 35 SCI patients receiving solifenacin for treatment of NDO between 2008 and 2012. Patients were categorized as being at risk of renal damage when maximum detrusor pressure was >40 cm H2O or detrusor compliance was <20 ml cm(-1) H2O.
Solifenacin treatment was initiated 7.3 years after SCI. Most patients (63%) had already been taking other antimuscarinic drugs. After 13.1 months (median, interquartile range 6.1-19.5 months), solifenacin treatment had resulted in significant (P<0.03) improvements in bladder capacity (median +30.0 ml), maximum detrusor pressure (median -7.0 cm H2O), reflex volume (median +62.5 ml) and detrusor compliance (median +25.0 ml cm(-1) H2O). Furthermore, fewer patients presented with a risk of renal damage. However, this difference was not significant (P>0.1). The number of patients suffering from incontinence had not changed significantly. Eight and two patients discontinued solifenacin treatment as a result of insufficient efficacy and intolerable adverse events, respectively. One patient had discontinued solifenacin treatment without further explanation.
Solifenacin treatment significantly improved bladder capacity, detrusor compliance, reflex volume and maximum detrusor pressure. Solifenacin treatment seems to be an effective oral treatment of NDO after SCI.
回顾性分析。
探讨索利那新治疗脊髓损伤(SCI)后神经源性逼尿肌过度活动(NDO)的尿动力学效应。
瑞士截瘫中心。
回顾性分析 2008 年至 2012 年间 35 例接受索利那新治疗 NDO 的 SCI 患者的病史和尿动力学资料。当最大逼尿肌压力>40cmH2O 或逼尿肌顺应性<20ml·cm-1·H2O 时,患者被归类为有肾损伤风险。
索利那新治疗在 SCI 后 7.3 年开始。大多数患者(63%)已经服用了其他抗毒蕈碱药物。在 13.1 个月(中位数,6.1-19.5 个月)后,索利那新治疗显著改善了膀胱容量(中位数增加 30.0ml)、最大逼尿肌压力(中位数降低 7.0cmH2O)、反射容积(中位数增加 62.5ml)和逼尿肌顺应性(中位数增加 25.0ml·cm-1·H2O)。此外,有肾损伤风险的患者减少。但差异无统计学意义(P>0.1)。尿失禁患者的数量没有明显变化。8 例和 2 例患者因疗效不足和不能耐受的不良反应分别停止索利那新治疗。1 例患者停止索利那新治疗,但未作进一步解释。
索利那新治疗显著改善了膀胱容量、逼尿肌顺应性、反射容积和最大逼尿肌压力。索利那新治疗似乎是 SCI 后 NDO 的一种有效口服治疗方法。