Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital.
Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen.
Ultraschall Med. 2012 Dec;33(7):E233-E240. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1313073. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
Rome III defines two distinct entities of functional dyspepsia (FD), namely epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) and postprandial distress syndrome (PDS). We aimed at studying these subgroups of FD by simultaneously assessing antral strain, gastric accommodation and emptying and visceral hypersensitivity.
Strain during antral contractions was assessed by ultrasound strain rate imaging in 15 controls and 19 FD patients (8 EPS patients and 11 PDS patients). Gastric accommodation and emptying were assessed using B-mode ultrasonography. Symptoms were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS).
During fasting, antral strain in EPS patients (mean±SEM) was 61.4 ± 6.4 %, significantly higher than in controls (47.5 ± 3.3 %; p = 0.042) and in PDS patients (28.6 ± 1.7 %; p = 0.001). PDS patients had lower strain than controls (p < 0.001). Postprandially, EPS patients had higher strain than both controls and PDS patients (p < 0.01) but no difference was found between controls and PDS patients. Compared with controls, PDS patients had significantly larger fasting proximal area than controls (14.9 ± 1.6 cm2 vs. 7.8 ± 0.2 cm2; p < 0.001), whereas EPS patients did not differ (12.1 ± 1.9 cm2; p = 0.057). Gastric emptying fraction (1 - proximal area at 40 min postprandially/area at 1 min postprandial × 100) at 40 min postprandially in EPS patients 46.4 ± 6.6 % was lower than in controls (62.9 ± 1.3 %; p = 0.032), but higher than PDS patients (27.4 ± 5.3 %; p = 0.018).
Anterior radial strain measured by ultrasound strain rate imaging may discriminate between subgroups of FD and healthy controls. This study supports the Rome III classification of FD into EPS and PDS groups.
罗马 III 定义了两种不同的功能性消化不良(FD)实体,即上腹痛综合征(EPS)和餐后不适综合征(PDS)。我们旨在通过同时评估胃窦应变、胃容纳和排空以及内脏敏感性来研究这些 FD 亚组。
通过超声应变率成像评估 15 名对照者和 19 名 FD 患者(8 名 EPS 患者和 11 名 PDS 患者)的胃窦收缩时的应变。使用 B 型超声评估胃容纳和排空。症状通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。
空腹时,EPS 患者的胃窦应变(平均值±SEM)为 61.4±6.4%,显著高于对照组(47.5±3.3%;p=0.042)和 PDS 患者(28.6±1.7%;p=0.001)。PDS 患者的应变低于对照组(p<0.001)。餐后,EPS 患者的应变高于对照组和 PDS 患者(p<0.01),但对照组和 PDS 患者之间无差异。与对照组相比,PDS 患者空腹时近端面积明显大于对照组(14.9±1.6 cm2 与 7.8±0.2 cm2;p<0.001),而 EPS 患者无差异(12.1±1.9 cm2;p=0.057)。餐后 40 分钟时,EPS 患者的胃排空分数(1-餐后 40 分钟时近端面积/餐后 1 分钟时面积×100)为 46.4±6.6%,低于对照组(62.9±1.3%;p=0.032),但高于 PDS 患者(27.4±5.3%;p=0.018)。
超声应变率成像测量的前向径向应变可区分 FD 亚组和健康对照组。本研究支持罗马 III 将 FD 分为 EPS 和 PDS 组的分类。