Di Stefano Michele, Miceli Emanuela, Tana Paola, Mengoli Caterina, Bergonzi Manuela, Pagani Elisabetta, Corazza Gino Roberto
1st Department of Medicine, University of Pavia, IRCCS "S. Matteo" Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct;109(10):1631-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.231. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
OBJECTIVES: Little information is available on the mechanisms responsible for dyspeptic symptoms in postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), characterized by the presence of prevalently meal-related early satiation and fullness, and the epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), characterized by the prominent symptom of epigastric pain, generally not meal related. In a group of PDS patients, the presence of hypersensitivity to gastric distension in both fasting and postprandial phases was described as the main pathophysiological mechanism; on the contrary, we have no information on the pathophysiology of EPS. METHODS: Sixty Helicobacter pylori (HP)-negative, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-negative, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-negative patients with functional dyspepsia according to Rome III criteria underwent symptom, anxiety, depression, and somatization evaluation, gastric barostat test, and gastric emptying time evaluation for solids. Fifteen age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (HVs) were also enrolled as a control group. RESULTS: In PDS patients, the prevalence of both fasting and postprandial hypersensitivity was higher than in EPS patients, and the extent of postprandial reduction of discomfort threshold was significantly correlated with symptom severity. In EPS patients, gastric volume at fasting discomfort threshold and fasting compliance were significantly lower than in PDS patients. Gastric emptying time and gastric accommodation were similar between the two dyspeptic groups. Dyspeptic patients showed a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders than HVs, but the prevalence was similar between PDS and EPS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting and postprandial hypersensitivity characterize PDS patients and a reduction of gastric compliance is present in EPS patients. However, the pathophysiology of EPS appears more complex than PDS and further studies are needed to analyze central processing and integration of afferent pathways in order to clarify the role of the central nervous system in this condition.
目的:关于餐后不适综合征(PDS)消化不良症状的机制,目前所知甚少。PDS的特征主要是与进餐相关的早饱及饱腹感,而上腹疼痛综合征(EPS)的主要症状是上腹部疼痛,通常与进餐无关。在一组PDS患者中,空腹和餐后阶段对胃扩张的超敏反应被描述为主要的病理生理机制;相反,我们对EPS的病理生理学尚无相关信息。 方法:根据罗马Ⅲ标准,选取60例幽门螺杆菌(HP)阴性、肠易激综合征(IBS)阴性及胃食管反流病(GERD)阴性的功能性消化不良患者,进行症状、焦虑、抑郁及躯体化评估、胃压力测定试验及固体食物胃排空时间评估。还纳入了15名年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者(HV)作为对照组。 结果:在PDS患者中,空腹和餐后超敏反应的发生率均高于EPS患者,餐后不适阈值降低的程度与症状严重程度显著相关。在EPS患者中,空腹不适阈值时的胃容量及空腹顺应性显著低于PDS患者。两组消化不良患者的胃排空时间及胃容纳功能相似。消化不良患者精神障碍的发生率高于HV,但PDS和EPS患者之间的发生率相似。 结论:空腹和餐后超敏反应是PDS患者的特征,EPS患者存在胃顺应性降低。然而,EPS的病理生理学似乎比PDS更复杂,需要进一步研究来分析传入通路的中枢处理和整合,以阐明中枢神经系统在这种情况下的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017-1
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015-8
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025-4-30
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022-1-30
Front Psychiatry. 2020-2-5
Pak J Med Sci. 2018
Dig Dis Sci. 2017-9
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017-1