Department of Social Work, Providence College, Providence, RI 02918, USA.
Soc Work. 2012 Jul;57(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/sw/sws021.
The author addresses the risks and benefits of incorporating therapeutic e-mail communication into clinical social work practice. Consumer demand for online clinical services is growing faster than the professional response. E-mail, when used as an adjunct to traditional meetings with clients, offers distinct advantages and risks. Benefits include the potential to reach clients in geographically remote and underserved communities, enhancing and extending the therapeutic relationship and improving treatment outcomes. Risks include threats to client confidentiality and privacy, liability coverage for practitioners, licensing jurisdiction, and the lack of competency standards for delivering e-mail interventions. Currently, the social work profession does not have adequate instructive guidelines and best-practice standards for using e-mail as a direct practice methodology. Practitioners need (formal) academic training in the techniques connected to e-mail exchanges with clients. The author describes the ethical and legal risks for practitioners using therapeutic e-mail with clients and identifies recommendations for establishing best-practice standards.
作者探讨了将治疗性电子邮件通信纳入临床社会工作实践的风险和益处。消费者对在线临床服务的需求增长速度超过了专业人员的响应速度。电子邮件作为与客户传统会议的辅助手段,具有明显的优势和风险。好处包括有可能接触到地理位置偏远和服务不足的社区的客户,加强和扩展治疗关系,并改善治疗效果。风险包括对客户机密性和隐私的威胁、从业者的责任保险、许可管辖权,以及缺乏提供电子邮件干预措施的能力标准。目前,社会工作专业没有足够的指导方针和最佳实践标准,将电子邮件用作直接实践方法。从业者需要(正式)接受与客户进行电子邮件交流相关技术的学术培训。作者描述了从业者使用治疗性电子邮件与客户联系的道德和法律风险,并确定了建立最佳实践标准的建议。