Suppr超能文献

强度调制放疗后鼻咽癌局部区域失败的批判性分析。

Critical analysis of locoregional failures following intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

机构信息

Radiotherapy 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2013 Jan;9(1):103-14. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.166.

Abstract

AIM

To analyze the patterns of locoregional failure following intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) at our institution, as part of an internal quality assurance program. We aimed to investigate the potential existence of a correlation between any part of the IMRT process and clinical outcome.

METHODS & MATERIALS: A total of 106 non-metastatic NPC patients consecutively treated with IMRT (with or without chemotherapy) were analyzed. Radiotherapy was administered using a sequential or simultaneous integrated boost approach at the total prescribed dose of 66-70 Gy (2.00-2.12 Gy per fraction). MRI studies of recurrences were recorded with the planning computed tomography studies to identify volume of failure. Recurrence-related characteristics were analyzed with respect to the original treatment. Failures were classified as 'in-field', 'marginal' or 'out-field' if at least 95, 20-95 or less than 20% of the volume of failure, respectively, was within 95% of the total prescription dose.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 43.4 months, 5-years local control, regional control, locoregional control and overall survival rates were 87.7, 88.0, 83.5 and 81.3% respectively. A total of 21 failures were registered in 15 patients. In particular, ten failures (47.6%) were classified as 'in-field' (seven local failures and three regional failures [RFs]), nine failures (42.9%) as 'marginal' (five local failures and four RFs) and only two failures (9.5%) as 'out-field' (both RFs). The most relevant causes of failures were suboptimal target definition and target coverage as well as a longer than planned overall treatment time.

CONCLUSION

IMRT determines excellent outcome in NPC patients. However, great attention in all IMRT steps is necessary to reduce potential causes of failure.

摘要

目的

作为内部质量保证计划的一部分,分析本机构接受调强放疗(IMRT)治疗的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者局部区域失败的模式。我们旨在研究 IMRT 过程的任何部分与临床结果之间是否存在相关性。

方法与材料

共分析了 106 例连续接受 IMRT(伴或不伴化疗)治疗的非转移性 NPC 患者。放疗采用序贯或同步整合升压方法,总处方剂量为 66-70Gy(2.00-2.12Gy/次)。将 MRI 研究中的复发情况与计划 CT 研究记录下来,以确定失败的体积。根据原始治疗分析复发相关特征。如果失败体积的至少 95%、20%-95%或不到 20%分别位于 95%总处方剂量内,则将失败分类为“场内”、“边缘”或“场外”。

结果

中位随访 43.4 个月后,5 年局部控制、区域控制、局部区域控制和总生存率分别为 87.7%、88.0%、83.5%和 81.3%。共有 15 名患者中出现 21 例失败。具体而言,10 例失败(47.6%)被归类为“场内”(7 例局部失败和 3 例区域失败[RF]),9 例失败(42.9%)为“边缘”(5 例局部失败和 4 例 RF),仅 2 例失败(9.5%)为“场外”(均为 RF)。失败的最主要原因是靶区定义和靶区覆盖不理想,以及总治疗时间长于计划时间。

结论

IMRT 为 NPC 患者带来了优异的结果。然而,在所有 IMRT 步骤中都需要高度关注,以减少潜在的失败原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验