• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻咽癌调强放射治疗后区域淋巴结失败模式

Patterns of nodal failure after intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

作者信息

Li Jin-Gao, Venigalla Praveen, Leeman Jonathan E, LaPlant Quincey, Setton Jeremy, Sherman Eric, Tsai Jillian, McBride Sean, Riaz Nadeem, Lee Nancy

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2017 Feb;127(2):377-382. doi: 10.1002/lary.26139. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1002/lary.26139
PMID:27438558
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the sites of nodal failure (NF) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 165 patients with nonmetastatic NPC treated with IMRT between July 1998 and April 2011 at our institution. Recurrent nodes were delineated on imaging and coregistered with the original treatment planning computed tomography. Failures were assessed as in-field, out-field, or marginal based on the relative volumes of the recurrent nodes covered by the original dose distribution.

RESULTS

Ten patients had NF at a median follow-up of 70.4 months for surviving patients. The 3- and 5-year overall survival and NF rates were 88.7%, 76.0% and 5.8%, 7.7%, respectively. Six of the nodal failures were in-field, of which five occurred in level II; whereas four had out-field failures, all of which were in the protected parotid gland area. There were no recurrences in level 1b despite this region being protected. The cumulative 3- and 5-year failure rates in the parotid gland area were 2.2% and 3.1%, respectively. Three patients with parotid failure initially had subcentimeter, nonspecific nodules in the same locations of the parotid gland as the recurrent nodes.

CONCLUSION

Nodal failure is uncommon after IMRT in NPC. Recurrence in the parotid gland region accounts for all of the out-field failures and 40% of NF in our study. Comprehensive assessment of nodules in or around the parotid gland is therefore a key aspect of treatment planning and follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

  1. Laryngoscope, 2016 127:377-382, 2017.
摘要

目的

评估接受调强放射治疗(IMRT)的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的区域淋巴结复发(NF)部位。

研究设计

回顾性病历审查。

方法

我们回顾了1998年7月至2011年4月在我院接受IMRT治疗的165例非转移性NPC患者的记录。在影像学上勾勒出复发淋巴结,并与原始治疗计划计算机断层扫描进行配准。根据复发淋巴结被原始剂量分布覆盖的相对体积,将复发评估为野内、野外或边缘复发。

结果

10例患者出现NF,存活患者的中位随访时间为70.4个月。3年和5年总生存率及NF发生率分别为88.7%、76.0%和5.8%、7.7%。6例区域淋巴结复发为野内复发,其中5例发生在Ⅱ区;4例为野外复发,均发生在腮腺保护区域。尽管1b区受到保护,但该区域未出现复发。腮腺区域3年和5年累积复发率分别为2.2%和3.1%。3例腮腺复发患者最初在腮腺与复发淋巴结相同位置有小于1厘米的非特异性结节。

结论

NPC患者接受IMRT后区域淋巴结复发并不常见。在我们的研究中,腮腺区域复发占所有野外复发的全部以及40%的区域淋巴结复发。因此,对腮腺内或其周围结节的综合评估是治疗计划和随访的关键方面。

证据级别

4。《喉镜》,2016年1月,第127卷:377 - 382页,2017年。

相似文献

1
Patterns of nodal failure after intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗后区域淋巴结失败模式
Laryngoscope. 2017 Feb;127(2):377-382. doi: 10.1002/lary.26139. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
2
Analysis of rare periparotid recurrence after parotid gland-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌腮腺保留调强放疗后罕见腮腺周围复发的分析
Cancer Radiother. 2016 Jul;20(5):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
3
Recurrences near base of skull after IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: implications for target delineation in high neck and for parotid gland sparing.头颈部癌调强放射治疗后颅底附近的复发:对高颈段靶区勾画及腮腺保护的意义
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.032.
4
Critical analysis of locoregional failures following intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.强度调制放疗后鼻咽癌局部区域失败的批判性分析。
Future Oncol. 2013 Jan;9(1):103-14. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.166.
5
Recurrence in region of spared parotid gland after definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.头颈部癌根治性调强放疗后腮腺保留区域的复发
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):660-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.018. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
6
Prognosis and staging of parotid lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An analysis in 10,126 patients.鼻咽癌腮腺淋巴结转移的预后和分期:10126 例患者分析。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Aug;95:150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
7
Patterns of local-regional failure after primary intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌调强适形放疗后局部区域复发模式
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Feb 19;9:60. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-60.
8
Distribution pattern and prognosis of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical posterior to level V in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.鼻咽癌患者颈 V 水平后区转移性淋巴结的分布模式与预后。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07146-z.
9
Parotid area lymph node metastases from preliminarily diagnosed patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report on tumor characteristics and oncologic outcomes.初诊鼻咽癌患者腮腺区淋巴结转移:肿瘤特征及肿瘤学结局报告
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 12;7(15):19654-65. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7677.
10
Comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment techniques for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌调强放射治疗(IMRT)技术的比较
Int J Cancer. 2001 Apr 20;96(2):126-31. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1004.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without Endostar on the regression of retropharyngeal lymph node and prognosis of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study.恩度联合放化疗对比单纯放化疗对局部晚期鼻咽癌患者咽后淋巴结退缩及预后的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 May 4;150(5):232. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05762-x.
2
Patterns of failure in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer of Northeastern region of India: a retrospective observational study.印度东北部地区鼻咽癌患者的失败模式:一项回顾性观察研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3743-3753. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08624-x. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
3
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A "different" head and neck tumour. Part B: treatment, prognostic factors, and outcomes.
鼻咽癌。一种“独特的”头颈部肿瘤。B部分:治疗、预后因素及结果。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2023 Jun;43(3):155-169. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2223.
4
Feasibility and safety of neck level IB-sparing radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer: a long-term single institution analysis.鼻咽癌颈部水平保留IB区放疗的可行性与安全性:一项长期单机构分析
Radiat Oncol J. 2022 Dec;40(4):260-269. doi: 10.3857/roj.2022.00346. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Epithelial Associated Malignancies: Exploring Pathologies and Current Treatments.EB 病毒(EBV)上皮相关恶性肿瘤:探索病理学和当前治疗方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 19;23(22):14389. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214389.
6
Patterns and prognosis of regional recurrence in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy.调强放疗后鼻咽癌区域性复发的模式和预后。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1399-1408. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5020. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
A novel dosimetric metrics-based risk model to predict local recurrence in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.一种基于新剂量学指标的风险模型,用于预测接受调强放疗的鼻咽癌患者的局部复发。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Sep 23;16(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01911-5.
8
Improved long-term results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for a non-endemic European nasopharyngeal carcinoma cohort: single-center retrospective study.调强放疗对非地方性欧洲鼻咽癌队列的长期效果改善:单中心回顾性研究
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Jul-Aug;25(4):521-526. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
9
Oncologic outcomes of IMRT versus CRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis.调强适形放疗与同步放化疗治疗鼻咽癌的肿瘤学结局:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(24):e15951. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015951.
10
Salinomycin may inhibit the cancer stem-like populations with increased chemoradioresistance that nasopharyngeal cancer tumorspheres contain.沙林霉素可能抑制鼻咽癌肿瘤球中具有增强放化疗抗性的癌症干细胞样群体。
Oncol Lett. 2018 Aug;16(2):2495-2500. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8923. Epub 2018 Jun 7.