Tellez Marisol, Gomez Juliana, Kaur Sundeep, Pretty Iain A, Ellwood Roger, Ismail Amid I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;41(1):79-96. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12028.
To critically appraise all evidence related to the efficacy of nonsurgical caries preventive methods to arrest or reverse the progression of noncavitated carious lesions (NCCls).
A detailed search of Medline (via OVID), Cochrane Collaboration, Scielo, and EMBASE identified 625 publications. After title and abstract review, 103 publications were selected for further review, and 29 were finally included. The final publications evaluated the following therapies: fluorides (F) in varying vehicles (toothpaste, gel, varnish, mouthrinse, and combination), chlorhexidine (CHX) alone or in combination with F, resin infiltration (I), sealants (S), xylitol (X) in varying vehicles (lozenges, gum, or in combination with F and/or xylitol), casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) or in combination with calcium fluoride phosphate. All included studies were randomized clinical trials, were conducted with human subjects and natural NCCls, and reported findings that can yield outcomes measures such as caries incidence/increments, percentage of progression and/or arrest, odds ratio progression test to control, fluorescence loss/mean values, changes in lesion area/volume and lesion depth. Data were extracted from the selected studies and checked for errors. The quality of the studies was evaluated by three different methods (ADA, Cochrane, author's consensus).
Sample size for these trials ranged between 15 and 3903 subjects, with a duration between 2 weeks and 4.02 years. More than half of the trials assessed had moderate to high risk of bias or may be categorized as 'poor'. The great majority (65.5%) did not use intention to treat analysis, 21% did not use any blinding techniques, and 41% reported concealment allocation procedures. Slightly more than half of the trials (55%) factored in background exposure to other fluoride sources, and only 41% properly adjusted for potential confounders.
Fluoride interventions (varnishes, gels, and toothpaste) seem to have the most consistent benefit in decreasing the progression and incidence of NCCls. Studies using xylitol, CHX, and CPP-ACP vehicles alone or in combination with fluoride therapy are very limited in number and in the majority of the cases did not show a statistically significant reduction. Sealants and resin infiltration studies point to a potential consistent benefit in slowing the progression or reversing NCCls.
严格评估与非手术性龋病预防方法阻止或逆转非龋洞性龋损(NCCls)进展的疗效相关的所有证据。
通过对医学文献数据库(通过OVID)、Cochrane协作网、Scielo和EMBASE进行详细检索,共识别出625篇出版物。在对标题和摘要进行审查后,选择了103篇出版物进行进一步审查,最终纳入29篇。最终纳入的出版物评估了以下治疗方法:不同载体(牙膏、凝胶、 varnish、漱口水及联合使用)中的氟化物(F)、单独使用或与氟化物联合使用的洗必泰(CHX)、树脂渗透(I)、窝沟封闭剂(S)、不同载体(含片、口香糖或与氟化物和/或木糖醇联合使用)中的木糖醇(X)、酪蛋白磷酸肽无定形磷酸钙(CPP - ACP)或与磷酸氟化钙联合使用。所有纳入研究均为随机临床试验,以人类受试者和自然发生的NCCls为研究对象,并报告了可得出诸如龋病发病率/增量、进展和/或静止百分比、进展试验与对照的比值比、荧光损失/平均值、病变面积/体积变化和病变深度等结果指标的研究结果。从选定的研究中提取数据并检查错误。采用三种不同方法(美国牙科协会、Cochrane协作网、作者共识)对研究质量进行评估。
这些试验的样本量在15至3903名受试者之间,持续时间在2周至4.02年之间。超过一半的评估试验存在中度至高度偏倚风险或可归类为“质量差”。绝大多数试验(65.5%)未采用意向性分析,21%未使用任何盲法技术,41%报告了随机分配隐藏程序。略超过一半的试验(55%)考虑了背景中其他氟源的暴露情况,只有41%对潜在混杂因素进行了适当调整。
氟化物干预措施(varnish、凝胶和牙膏)在降低NCCls的进展和发病率方面似乎具有最一致的益处。单独使用或与氟化物治疗联合使用木糖醇、CHX和CPP - ACP载体的研究数量非常有限,并且在大多数情况下未显示出统计学上的显著降低。窝沟封闭剂和树脂渗透研究表明在减缓进展或逆转NCCls方面可能具有一致的益处。