Vitiello Flavia, Tosco Vincenzo, Monterubbianesi Riccardo, Orilisi Giulia, Gatto Maria Laura, Sparabombe Scilla, Memé Lucia, Mengucci Paolo, Putignano Angelo, Orsini Giovanna
Department of Clinical Sciences and Stomatology (DISCO), Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Department of Materials, Environmental Sciences and Urban Planning (SIMAU) & UdR INSTM, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 22;15(13):4398. doi: 10.3390/ma15134398.
Dental remineralization represents the process of depositing calcium and phosphate ions into crystal voids in demineralized enamel, producing net mineral gain and preventing early enamel lesions progression. The aim of the present study was to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the remineralizing effectiveness of four commercially available agents on enamel artificial lesions using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) combined with Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) techniques. Thirty-six extracted third molars were collected and randomly assigned to six groups (n = 6), five of which were suspended in demineralizing solution for 72 h to create enamel artificial lesions, and one serving as control: G1, treated with a mousse of casein phosphopeptide and amorphous calcium−phosphate (CPP-ACP); G2, treated with a gel containing nano-hydroxyapatite; G3, treated with a 5% SF varnish; G4, treated with a toothpaste containing ACP functionalized with fluoride and carbonate-coated with citrate; G5, not-treated artificial enamel lesions; G6, not demineralized and not treated sound enamel. G1−G4 were subjected to pH cycling over a period of seven days. Analyses of the specimens’ enamel surfaces morphology were performed by SEM and EDS. Data were statistically analyzed for multiple group comparison by one-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). The results show that the Ca/P ratio of the G5 (2.00 ± 0.07) was statistically different (p < 0.05) from G1 (1.73 ± 0.05), G2 (1.76 ± 0.01), G3 (1.88 ± 0.06) and G6 (1.74 ± 0.04), while there were no differences (p > 0.05) between G1, G2 and G6 and between G4 (2.01 ± 0.06) and G5. We concluded that G1 and G2 showed better surface remineralization than G3 and G4, after 7 days of treatment.
牙齿再矿化是指将钙和磷酸根离子沉积到脱矿釉质的晶体空隙中,实现净矿物质增加并阻止早期釉质病变进展的过程。本研究的目的是使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)结合能谱仪(EDS)技术,定性和定量比较四种市售试剂对釉质人工病变的再矿化效果。收集36颗拔除的第三磨牙并随机分为六组(n = 6),其中五组悬浮于脱矿溶液中72小时以制造釉质人工病变,一组作为对照:G1组,用酪蛋白磷酸肽和无定形磷酸钙(CPP-ACP)泡沫处理;G2组,用含纳米羟基磷灰石的凝胶处理;G3组,用5%的SF清漆处理;G4组,用含氟官能化ACP且涂有柠檬酸盐的碳酸盐的牙膏处理;G5组,未处理的人工釉质病变;G6组,未脱矿且未处理的完好釉质。G1 - G4组进行为期七天的pH循环。通过SEM和EDS对标本的釉质表面形态进行分析。数据采用单因素方差分析/ Tukey检验进行多组比较的统计学分析(p < 0.05)。结果显示,G5组的Ca/P比(2.00 ± 0.07)与G1组(1.73 ± 0.05)、G2组(1.76 ± 0.01)、G3组(1.88 ± 0.06)和G6组(1.74 ± 0.04)在统计学上有差异(p < 0.05),而G1、G2和G6组之间以及G4组(2.01 ± 0.06)和G5组之间无差异(p > 0.05)。我们得出结论,治疗7天后,G1组和G2组的表面再矿化效果优于G3组和G4组。