Divisions of General Medical Rehabilitation, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pain Med. 2012 Dec;13(12):1562-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01501.x.
To compare fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) patients' narratives about symptom onset. This investigation aimed to better understand how patients with FM relate to their pain problem and the physicians in charge of making the diagnosis.
Qualitative study.
We included 56 female patients with FM and 29 with LBP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, eliciting patients' representations of symptom onset. Interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed, and content analysis was performed.
Patients with FM and LBP were comparable for socio-demographic characteristics and pain duration. Content analysis identified five dimensions: psychological issues, somatic concerns, occupational problems, diagnostic issues, and issues related to chronicity. FM patients emphasized psychological issues, as single events and long-lasting distress. Regarding somatic concerns, gynecological events were prominent in FM while LBP patients emphasized accidents, awkward movements, and physical work conditions. Both groups expressed pessimistic views about pain evolution. FM patients reported diagnosis as an area of major uncertainty in an illness perceived as spreading all over the body.
The narratives of patients with FM expressed high psychological loads and dramatic connotations and emphasized legitimacy issues. In contrast, patients with LBP stressed overload, wear and tear, and treatment inefficacy. The combination of chronicity and lack of specificity may render FM and LBP prone to raise skepticism in the therapists. Investigating and discussing patients' perceptions allows overcoming the apparent uniformity of patients' complaints. It contributes defining realistic and shared treatment goals and help therapists cope with pain chronicity.
比较纤维肌痛(FM)和慢性非特异性下腰痛(LBP)患者对症状发作的叙述。本研究旨在更好地理解 FM 患者如何与他们的疼痛问题以及负责做出诊断的医生相关联。
定性研究。
我们纳入了 56 名女性 FM 患者和 29 名 LBP 患者。进行了半结构式访谈,引出患者对症状发作的描述。访谈进行了录音和转录,并进行了内容分析。
FM 和 LBP 患者在社会人口统计学特征和疼痛持续时间方面具有可比性。内容分析确定了五个维度:心理问题、躯体问题、职业问题、诊断问题和与慢性相关的问题。FM 患者强调心理问题,如单一事件和长期困扰。关于躯体问题,妇科事件在 FM 中突出,而 LBP 患者强调意外、尴尬的动作和物理工作条件。两组患者对疼痛演变都持悲观态度。FM 患者报告诊断为一种主要的不确定性领域,这种疾病被认为是全身扩散的。
FM 患者的叙述表达了高度的心理负担和戏剧性的内涵,并强调了合法性问题。相比之下,LBP 患者强调了过载、磨损和治疗无效。慢性和缺乏特异性的结合可能使 FM 和 LBP 容易引起治疗师的怀疑。调查和讨论患者的感知可以克服患者抱怨的明显一致性。它有助于确定现实和共同的治疗目标,并帮助治疗师应对疼痛的慢性。