Bennett M
Department of Psychology, Roehampton Institute, London, England.
J Soc Psychol. 1990 Feb;130(1):29-37. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1990.9922930.
Despite earlier work indicating young children's competence in the use and understanding of retrospective "facework strategies" such as apologies, justifications, and excuses, it was hypothesized that an understanding of the disclaimer, a prospective strategy, would be relatively late appearing. An experiment is reported in which 144 British children between the ages of 5 and 11 years were presented with stories concerning an actor who had brought about certain negative consequences, having either previously issued, or not, a disclaimer. Children were asked to indicate and justify whether they felt the actor should be punished. Broadly consistent with the hypothesis guiding the present study, significant reductions in punishment recommendations following the provision of a disclaimer were found only among the 11-year-old subjects. However, from subjects' justifications for the decision not to punish, it was noted that nearly 50% of the 8-year-olds and 25% of the 5-year-olds provided evidence of understanding the mitigating function of disclaimers.
尽管早期研究表明幼儿具备运用和理解诸如道歉、辩解和借口等追溯性“面子工程策略”的能力,但据推测,对免责声明(一种前瞻性策略)的理解会相对较晚出现。本文报告了一项实验,向144名年龄在5至11岁之间的英国儿童呈现有关一名演员造成某些负面后果的故事,该演员此前要么发布了免责声明,要么没有发布。要求孩子们指出并说明他们是否认为该演员应受到惩罚。与指导本研究的假设大致一致,仅在11岁的受试者中发现,在提供免责声明后,惩罚建议显著减少。然而,从受试者对不惩罚决定的理由中可以看出,近50%的8岁儿童和25%的5岁儿童提供了理解免责声明减轻作用的证据。