1Department of Physiology, Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, Australia 2School of Human Movement Studies, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Oct;27(10):2723-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280c6fb.
There is a paucity of evidence-based support for the allocation of rest interval duration between incremental loads in the assessment of the load-power profile. We examined the effect of rest interval duration on muscular power production in the load-power profile and sought to determine if greater rest is required with increasing load (i.e., variable rest interval). Ten physically trained men completed 4 experimental conditions in a crossover balanced design. Participants performed jump squats across incremental loads (0-60 kg) on 4 occasions, with an allocated recovery interval of 1, 2, 3, or 4 minutes. The mean log-transformed power output at each load was used for comparison between conditions (rest intervals). Unloaded jump squats (0 kg) maximized power output at each condition. The maximal mechanical power output was 66.6 ± 6.5 W·kg (1 minute), 66.2 ± 5.2 W·kg (2 minutes), 67.1 ± 5.9 W·kg (3 minutes), and 66.2 ± 6.5 W·kg (4 minutes). Trivial or unclear differences in power output were observed between rest intervals at each incremental load. As expected, power declined per 10 kg increment in load, the magnitude of decrease was 13.9-14.5% (confidence limits [CL]: ±1.3-2.0%) and 13.4-14.6% (CL: ±2.4-3.9%) for relative peak and mean power, respectively, yet differences in power output between conditions were likely insubstantial. The prescription of rest intervals between loads that are longer than 1 minute have a likely negligible effect on muscular power production in the jump squat incremental load-power profile. Practitioners should select either a 1- to 4-minute rest interval to best accommodate the logistical constraints of their monitoring sessions.
在评估负荷-功率特征时,增量负荷之间的休息间隔持续时间的分配缺乏循证支持。我们研究了休息间隔持续时间对负荷-功率特征中肌肉力量产生的影响,并试图确定随着负荷的增加(即可变休息间隔)是否需要更多的休息。10 名体能训练的男性以交叉平衡设计完成了 4 项实验条件。参与者在 4 次跳跃深蹲中完成递增负荷(0-60 公斤),分配的恢复间隔为 1、2、3 或 4 分钟。在条件(休息间隔)之间比较时,使用平均对数转换后的功率输出。在每个条件下,空载跳跃深蹲(0 公斤)使功率输出最大化。最大机械功率输出为 66.6±6.5 W·kg(1 分钟)、66.2±5.2 W·kg(2 分钟)、67.1±5.9 W·kg(3 分钟)和 66.2±6.5 W·kg(4 分钟)。在每个递增负荷的休息间隔之间观察到功率输出的微不足道或不明显差异。如预期的那样,随着负荷每增加 10 公斤,功率下降,下降幅度分别为 13.9-14.5%(置信区间[CL]:±1.3-2.0%)和 13.4-14.6%(CL:±2.4-3.9%)相对峰值和平均功率,但条件之间的功率输出差异可能微不足道。在跳跃深蹲递增负荷-功率特征中,负载之间的休息间隔时间超过 1 分钟可能对肌肉力量产生的影响可以忽略不计。从业者应选择 1 到 4 分钟的休息间隔,以最好地适应他们监测会话的逻辑约束。