• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

休息间隔对凯泽10次重复腿部推举测试中获得的力-速度关系的影响。

The Impact of Rest Intervals on the Force-Velocity Relationship Obtained During the Keiser's 10-Repetition Leg Press Test.

作者信息

Kalhovde John Magne, Johannessen Christian M M, Aasen Sigmund B, Tønnessen Espen

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Kristiania University College, 0153 Oslo, Norway.

Department of Education and Sports Science, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 14;10(1):31. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010031.

DOI:10.3390/jfmk10010031
PMID:39846672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11755609/
Abstract

The Keiser 10-rep leg press test protocol employs short inter-repetition rest intervals (2-38 s), raising concerns as to whether athletes perform optimally. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the standard Keiser protocol with an identical protocol modified to include a significantly longer inter-repetition rest intervals and to evaluate whether these effects differed between men and women. A total of 30 athletes (age 17.1 ± 0.9 years, height 177.8 ± 8.8 cm, and body mass 71.9 ± 11.3 kg) performed three separate tests (total of ~900 repetitions) in a Keiser A420 leg press machine, separated by 4 to 8 days. Test day 1 included a 1RM test followed by a 10-repetition force-velocity test with a standard rest intervals. Test days 2 and 3 involved the same test, with either standard short rest intervals or fixed 3 min inter-repetition rest intervals. Increasing inter-repetition rest intervals significantly improved and for men and and for women. The benefits of longer rest were notably more pronounced in men, particularly at light to moderate loads, where standard Keiser rest intervals are short (2-9 s). However, extending rest intervals beyond approximately 30 s, as applied at higher loads, provided no additional advantages. Longer rest intervals improved force-velocity metrics more in men than women, with the effect being most pronounced at light to moderate loads where standard protocols utilize short rest intervals (2-9 s). These findings suggest that women recover faster than men under these conditions. However, extending rest beyond 30 s at higher loads provides no additional benefits and is counterproductive at maximal loads.

摘要

凯泽尔10次重复腿部推举测试方案采用较短的重复间休息间隔(2 - 38秒),这引发了人们对运动员是否能达到最佳表现的担忧。本研究的目的是比较标准凯泽尔方案与经过修改的相同方案的结果,修改后的方案包括显著更长的重复间休息间隔,并评估这些影响在男性和女性之间是否存在差异。共有30名运动员(年龄17.1±0.9岁,身高177.8±8.8厘米,体重71.9±11.3千克)在凯泽尔A420腿部推举机上进行了三次独立测试(总共约900次重复),测试间隔为4至8天。第1天的测试包括一次1RM测试,随后是一次采用标准休息间隔的10次重复力 - 速度测试。第2天和第3天进行相同的测试,采用标准的短休息间隔或固定的3分钟重复间休息间隔。增加重复间休息间隔显著提高了男性的[具体指标1]和[具体指标2],以及女性的[具体指标3]和[具体指标4]。更长休息间隔的益处在男性中尤为明显,特别是在轻至中等负荷下(标准凯泽尔休息间隔较短,为2 - 9秒)。然而,在较高负荷下将休息间隔延长至约30秒以上并没有额外的优势。更长的休息间隔对男性力 - 速度指标的改善比对女性更明显,这种影响在标准方案采用短休息间隔(2 - 9秒)的轻至中等负荷下最为显著。这些发现表明,在这些条件下女性比男性恢复得更快。然而,在较高负荷下将休息延长至30秒以上没有额外益处,在最大负荷下甚至会适得其反。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f7c/11755609/e7273768b5e3/jfmk-10-00031-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f7c/11755609/95c00886bfdb/jfmk-10-00031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f7c/11755609/e7273768b5e3/jfmk-10-00031-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f7c/11755609/95c00886bfdb/jfmk-10-00031-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f7c/11755609/e7273768b5e3/jfmk-10-00031-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Rest Intervals on the Force-Velocity Relationship Obtained During the Keiser's 10-Repetition Leg Press Test.休息间隔对凯泽10次重复腿部推举测试中获得的力-速度关系的影响。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jan 14;10(1):31. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10010031.
2
Acute effects of different set configurations during a strength-oriented resistance training session on barbell velocity and the force-velocity relationship in resistance-trained males and females.力量型抗阻训练中不同设置组合对杠铃速度及抗阻训练男性和女性力量-速度关系的急性影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 Jun;119(6):1409-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04131-8. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
3
Reliability and Validity of Different Lower-Limb Strength Tests to Determine 1RM in the Keiser A300 Leg Press.不同下肢力量测试在凯瑟 A300 腿推器上确定 1RM 的可靠性和有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Oct 1;37(10):1963-1968. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004516.
4
Monitoring Changes in Lower-Limb Strength and Power in Elite Athletes With the Countermovement-Jump and Keiser Leg-Press Tests.监测使用反跳式和凯瑟腿部压力测试的精英运动员下肢力量和功率的变化。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023 Jul 14;18(10):1145-1151. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0088. Print 2023 Oct 1.
5
Effect of Different Types of Loads on the Force-Velocity Relationship Obtained During the Bench Press Throw Exercise.不同类型负荷对卧推投练习中获得的力量-速度关系的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Sep 1;35(9):2401-2406. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003183.
6
Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones.针对三种不同抗阻训练方案的肌肉适应性:重复最大值训练区的特异性
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Nov;88(1-2):50-60. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0681-6. Epub 2002 Aug 15.
7
Validity of Force-Velocity Profiling Assessed With a Pneumatic Leg Press Device.气动腿部按压设备评估力量-速度曲线分析的有效性。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):1777-1785. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0954. Epub 2021 May 27.
8
Effects of Different Loading Types on the Validity and Magnitude of Force-Velocity Relationship Parameters.不同加载类型对力量-速度关系参数的有效性和幅度的影响。
Sports Health. 2024 Jul-Aug;16(4):630-636. doi: 10.1177/19417381231182131. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
9
Does resistance exercise lifting velocity change with different rest intervals?抗阻运动的举起重物速度是否会随不同的休息间隔而改变?
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2023 Mar;63(3):402-408. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.22.14079-X. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
10
The effect of rest interval length on bench press performance with heavy vs. light loads.休息间隔时长对重负荷与轻负荷卧推表现的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2006 May;20(2):396-9. doi: 10.1519/R-17735.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a 20-Week Resistance Training Program on the Force-Velocity Profile in Novice Lifters Using Isokinetic Two-Point Testing.一项为期20周的抗阻训练计划对使用等速两点测试的新手举重运动员力量-速度曲线的影响。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Nov 5;9(4):222. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040222.
2
Give it a rest: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysis on the effect of inter-set rest interval duration on muscle hypertrophy.歇一歇:一项关于组间休息间隔时长对肌肉肥大影响的贝叶斯Meta分析的系统评价
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Aug 14;6:1429789. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1429789. eCollection 2024.
3
Reliability and Validity of Different Lower-Limb Strength Tests to Determine 1RM in the Keiser A300 Leg Press.
不同下肢力量测试在凯瑟 A300 腿推器上确定 1RM 的可靠性和有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Oct 1;37(10):1963-1968. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004516.
4
Effects of lower-extremity explosive strength on youth judo athletes adopting different types of power-based resistance training.下肢爆发力对采用不同类型基于力量的阻力训练的青少年柔道运动员的影响。
Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1065036. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1065036. eCollection 2023.
5
The Force-Velocity Profile for Jumping: What It Is and What It Is Not.跳跃的力-速度曲线:是什么及不是什么。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Jul 1;55(7):1241-1249. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003147. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
6
Effect of Traditional, Rest Redistribution, and Velocity-Based Prescription on Repeated Sprint Training Performance and Responses in Semiprofessional Athletes.传统、恢复再分配和基于速度的处方对半职业运动员重复冲刺训练表现和反应的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Aug 1;37(8):1566-1572. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004438. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
7
Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework.定义培训和绩效水平:参与者分类框架。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):317-331. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0451. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
8
Validity of Force-Velocity Profiling Assessed With a Pneumatic Leg Press Device.气动腿部按压设备评估力量-速度曲线分析的有效性。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):1777-1785. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0954. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
Reliability of the Squat Jump Force-Velocity and Load-Velocity Profiles.深蹲跳力量-速度和负荷-速度曲线的可靠性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Nov 1;36(11):3000-3007. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004057. Epub 2021 May 5.
10
Force-velocity profiling in athletes: Reliability and agreement across methods.运动员的力量-速度特征分析:不同方法的可靠性和一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 1;16(2):e0245791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245791. eCollection 2021.