• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessing nurses' ability to classify pressure ulcers correctly.

作者信息

Kelly Jennifer, Isted Michelle

机构信息

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Norfolk.

出版信息

Nurs Stand. 2011;26(7):62, 64, 66 passim. doi: 10.7748/ns2011.10.26.7.62.c8762.

DOI:10.7748/ns2011.10.26.7.62.c8762
PMID:23256259
Abstract

Reduction of pressure ulcers is a key government target, with particular emphasis on the more serious category 3 and 4 ulcers. An audit using photographs of pressure ulcers identified that nurses could correctly classify pressure ulcers 56% of the time using the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system. An intensive training programme resulted in an increase in accuracy of grading pressure ulcers to 62%. The results of this audit call into question the accuracy of pressure ulcer prevalence figures and highlight the difficulties experienced in classifying pressure ulcers.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessing nurses' ability to classify pressure ulcers correctly.
Nurs Stand. 2011;26(7):62, 64, 66 passim. doi: 10.7748/ns2011.10.26.7.62.c8762.
2
Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.欧洲压疮咨询小组分类系统的可靠性。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Apr;54(2):189-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03801.x.
3
How accurate are RGNs in grading pressure ulcers?注册一般护士在给压疮分级方面的准确性如何?
Br J Nurs. 2006;15(22):1230-4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.22.22561.
4
EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study.欧洲压疮咨询小组(EPUAP)压疮分类系统:欧洲可靠性研究
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Dec;60(6):682-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04474.x.
5
Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs.使用照片评估欧洲压力性溃疡咨询小组(EPUAP)压力性溃疡分类系统的评分者间信度。
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Nov;13(8):952-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00974.x.
6
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system.国家压疮咨询小组更新的压疮分期系统。
Urol Nurs. 2007 Apr;27(2):144-50, 156.
7
Controversies in classifying and assessing grade I pressure ulcers.I期压疮分类与评估中的争议
J Wound Care. 2003 Jan;12(1):33-6. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2003.12.1.26453.
8
Pressure ulcer classification: the systems and the pitfalls.
Br J Nurs. 2002 Jun;11(12 Suppl):S49-50, S52, S54-7 passim. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2002.11.Sup2.10310.
9
An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.一项在家庭护理环境中使用Braden量表评估压疮风险及压疮分类的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
10
[Differentiation between moisture lesions and pressure ulcers using photographs in a critical area].[利用关键部位照片鉴别潮湿性损伤与压疮]
Enferm Clin. 2016 Sep-Oct;26(5):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jul 27.