Department of Pediatrics, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Pediatr. 2013 May;162(5):949-54.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
To determine whether postextubation respiratory support via heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannulae (HHHFNC) results in a greater proportion of infants younger than 32 weeks' gestation being successfully extubated after a period of endotracheal positive pressure ventilation compared with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP).
We randomly assigned preterm ventilated infants to Vapotherm HHHFNC or NCPAP after extubation. The primary outcome, extubation failure, was defined by prespecified failure criteria in the 7 days after extubation.
A total of 132 ventilated infants younger than 32 weeks' gestation were randomized to receive either HHHFNC (n = 67) or NCPAP (n = 65). Extubation failure occurred in 15 (22%) of the HHHFNC group compared with 22 (34%) of the NCPAP group. There was no difference in the number of infants reintubated in the first week. Treatment with HHHFNC reduced the nasal trauma score 3.1 (SD 7.2) versus NCPAP 11.8 (SD 10.7), P < .001.
HHHFNC and NCPAP produced similar rates of extubation failure.
比较经加热、湿化、高流量鼻导管(HHHFNC)与常规鼻塞持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)对早产儿拔管后,能否增加更多胎龄小于 32 周的婴儿成功拔管的比例。
我们将接受气管内正压通气的早产儿随机分配至 Vapotherm HHHFNC 或 NCPAP 组。主要结局为拔管后 7 天内出现预设的拔管失败标准。
共有 132 名胎龄小于 32 周的接受机械通气的婴儿被随机分配至 HHHFNC 组(n = 67)或 NCPAP 组(n = 65)。HHHFNC 组有 15 名(22%)婴儿拔管失败,NCPAP 组有 22 名(34%)婴儿拔管失败。两组在第一周重新插管的婴儿数量无差异。与 NCPAP 相比,HHHFNC 组的鼻损伤评分降低了 3.1(SD 7.2),NCPAP 组降低了 11.8(SD 10.7),P <.001。
HHHFNC 与 NCPAP 组的拔管失败发生率相似。