Departments of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-9277, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2013 Apr;120(4):795-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.032. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) causes hypoperfusion, high levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), macular edema, and loss of vision. Many patients also show areas of complete closure of retinal vessels (retinal nonperfusion [RNP]) that increase over time. The objective was to assess the effect of blocking VEGF on progression of RNP.
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2 randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trials.
A total of 392 and 397 patients with macular edema due to CRVO or BRVO.
An independent reading center measured the area of RNP on fluorescein angiograms (FAs) in 2 phase III trials investigating the effect of ranibizumab (RBZ; Lucentis; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) in patients with CRVO or BRVO.
The percentage of patients with no posterior RNP at months 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12.
There was no difference among treatment groups at baseline, but at the month 6 primary end point the percentage of patients with CRVO and no RNP was significantly greater in the RBZ groups (0.3 mg, 82.0%, P = 0.0092; 0.5 mg, 84.0%, P = 0.0067) versus the sham group (67.0%). Reperfusion of nonperfused retina was rare (1%) in sham-treated patients with CRVO, but occurred in 6% to 8% of patients with CRVO treated with RBZ (30% of those who had RNP and could improve). Results in patients with BRVO mirrored those in patients with CRVO. Crossover to 0.5 mg RBZ from sham at month 6 halted the progression of RNP and resulted in improvement in both CRVO and BRVO.
Treatment with RBZ did not worsen RNP in patients with RVO, but rather reduced its occurrence compared with sham. These data provide an important new insight regarding the pathogenesis of RVO; the initial vein occlusion is a precipitating event that causes baseline ischemia and release of VEGF, which then contributes to progression of RNP and thus worsening of ischemia. Timely, aggressive blockade of VEGF prevents the worsening of RNP, promotes reperfusion, and eliminates a positive feedback loop.
视网膜中央静脉阻塞(CRVO)或视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)导致灌注不足、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平升高、黄斑水肿和视力丧失。许多患者还表现出视网膜血管完全闭塞(视网膜无灌注[RNP])的区域,这些区域随时间推移而增加。目的是评估阻断 VEGF 对 RNP 进展的影响。
对 2 项随机、假注射对照、双盲、多中心临床试验前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。
共 392 例和 397 例因 CRVO 或 BRVO 导致黄斑水肿的患者。
一个独立的阅读中心在 2 项 III 期临床试验中测量了荧光素血管造影(FA)上 RNP 的面积,这些试验研究了雷珠单抗(RBZ;Lucentis;基因泰克公司,旧金山南部,加利福尼亚州)在 CRVO 或 BRVO 患者中的作用。
0、3、6、9 和 12 个月时无后部 RNP 的患者百分比。
基线时各组之间无差异,但在 6 个月的主要终点时,RBZ 组(0.3mg 组 82.0%,P=0.0092;0.5mg 组 84.0%,P=0.0067)无 RNP 的 CRVO 患者百分比显著高于假手术组(67.0%)。CRVO 假手术治疗患者中再灌注非灌注视网膜的情况很少见(1%),但 RBZ 治疗的 CRVO 患者中发生率为 6%至 8%(有 RNP 且可以改善的患者中占 30%)。BRVO 患者的结果与 CRVO 患者相似。6 个月时从假手术转为 0.5mg RBZ 可阻止 RNP 的进展,并改善 CRVO 和 BRVO。
RBZ 治疗不会使 RVO 患者的 RNP 恶化,反而会减少 RNP 的发生。这些数据提供了一个关于 RVO 发病机制的重要新见解;最初的静脉闭塞是一个引发事件,导致基线缺血和 VEGF 释放,进而导致 RNP 进展和缺血恶化。及时、积极地阻断 VEGF 可防止 RNP 恶化、促进再灌注并消除正反馈循环。