Melbourne Brain Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):543-50. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120971. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
To perform a large-scale systematic comparison of the accuracy of all commonly used perfusion computed tomography (CT) data postprocessing methods in the definition of infarct core and penumbra in acute stroke.
The collection of data for this study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave informed consent. Three hundred fourteen patients with hemispheric ischemia underwent perfusion CT within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 24 hours. CT perfusion maps were generated by using six different postprocessing methods. Pixel-based analysis was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity of different perfusion CT thresholds for the penumbra and infarct core with each postprocessing method, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis was used to define the optimum threshold.
Delay-corrected singular value deconvolution (SVD) with a delay time of more than 2 seconds most accurately defined the penumbra (AUC = 0.86, P = .046, mean volume difference between acute perfusion CT and 24-hour diffusion-weighted MR imaging = 1.7 mL). A double core threshold with a delay time of more than 2 seconds and cerebral blood flow less than 40% provided the most accurate definition of the infarct core (AUC = 0.86, P = .038). The other SVD measures (block circulant, nondelay corrected) were more accurate than non-SVD methods.
This study has shown that there is marked variability in penumbra and infarct prediction among various deconvolution techniques and highlights the need for standardization of perfusion CT in stroke.
http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120971/-/DC1.
大规模系统比较所有常用灌注 CT(CT)数据后处理方法在急性脑卒中核心梗死区和半暗带定义中的准确性。
本研究的数据收集得到了机构伦理委员会的批准,所有患者均签署了知情同意书。314 例半球性缺血患者在卒中症状发作后 6 小时内行灌注 CT 检查,并在 24 小时内行磁共振(MR)成像检查。采用 6 种不同的后处理方法生成 CT 灌注图。采用像素分析计算不同后处理方法下每种灌注 CT 阈值对半暗带和梗死核心的灵敏度和特异性,并绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。采用 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分析定义最佳阈值。
时滞校正奇异值分解(SVD)的时滞时间超过 2 秒时,对半暗带的定义最为准确(AUC=0.86,P=0.046,急性灌注 CT 与 24 小时弥散加权 MR 成像之间的平均体积差异为 1.7 mL)。时滞时间超过 2 秒且脑血流小于 40%的双核心阈值提供了对梗死核心最准确的定义(AUC=0.86,P=0.038)。其他 SVD 测量方法(块循环、非时滞校正)比非 SVD 方法更准确。
本研究表明,各种解卷积技术对半暗带和梗死预测存在明显差异,强调需要对卒中灌注 CT 进行标准化。
http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120971/-/DC1.