Mundinger A, Dengel H, Leibersperger H
Radiologische Klinik, St. Vincentius-Krankenhäuser, Karlsruhe.
Radiologe. 1990 Jan;30(1):34-8.
In a controlled study, we analyzed the efficiency of cleansing out the colon and the best contrast medium of two different regimens (total n = 237) for preparing the colon for double-contrast examination. The recommendations regarding diet and liquid intake, contrast medium and examination technique were identical in both groups. The combination laxative Prepacol without cleansing enema resulted in a more thoroughly cleaned colon that ricinol with cleansing enema (very good/good cleanliness: Prepacol, 92.4%; ricinol, 83.2%, p less than 0.05). However, the quality of contrast medium (good: Prepacol 71.2% as opposed to ricinol 74.8%) was (independent of the preparation method) below standard regarding cleansing of the colon. Better patient compliance was accomplished by Prepacol because the medication was easier to take, and omitting the cleansing enema was a reduction in burden for both patients and medical staff. Written instructions for diet is essential and was of help to the patients.
在一项对照研究中,我们分析了两种不同方案(共237例)用于结肠双重对比检查肠道准备时的结肠清洁效率及最佳造影剂。两组在饮食和液体摄入、造影剂及检查技术方面的建议相同。不进行清洁灌肠的缓泻剂组合Prepacol能使结肠清洁得更彻底,优于进行清洁灌肠的蓖麻油(清洁度非常好/好:Prepacol为92.4%,蓖麻油为83.2%,p<0.05)。然而,造影剂质量(好:Prepacol为71.2%,蓖麻油为74.8%)(与准备方法无关)在结肠清洁方面低于标准。Prepacol使患者依从性更好,因为该药服用更方便,且省去清洁灌肠对患者和医护人员来说都是减轻负担。饮食书面指导很重要,对患者有帮助。