Tufts Jennifer B, Jahn Kelly N, Byram John P
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, 850 Bolton Road, Unit 1085, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Jun;57(5):571-80. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes096. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
Hearing protection devices (HPDs) play a significant role in protecting workers from occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Individual HPD fit-testing estimates the amount of protection, or attenuation, that an individual achieves from a given HPD as it is worn. Results from a single fit-test may not be representative of real-world HPD performance over time, however, due to inconsistency in how the individual fits the HPD from time to time. In this study, the effects of HPD type and user training on the consistency of attenuation achieved across multiple fittings were evaluated in a within-subjects design. Attenuation measurements using a real-ear attenuation at threshold procedure were obtained on 30 participants wearing custom-molded and non-custom earplugs. The subjects were initially naive to proper earplug insertion techniques and later received one-on-one training for the second half of the attenuation measurements. Consistency, or reliability, of fit was assessed using (i) the standard deviation of the 'distance to ear mean attenuation', a measure of fitting uncertainty, and (ii) the standard deviation of the attenuation values across multiple fit-tests for each subject. The custom earplug provided statistically significantly better consistency of attenuation than the non-custom earplug at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. Training effects were statistically significant at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz and at the Personal Attenuation Rating. No interactions were statistically significant. These results indicate that, in general, subjects obtained more consistent attenuation with the custom earplugs than with the non-custom earplugs and that consistency improved with training for both earplug types.
听力保护装置(HPDs)在保护工人免受职业性噪声所致听力损失方面发挥着重要作用。个体HPD适配测试可估算个体佩戴特定HPD时所获得的保护量或衰减量。然而,由于个体每次佩戴HPD的方式不一致,单次适配测试的结果可能无法代表HPD在实际使用中的长期性能。在本研究中,采用受试者内设计评估了HPD类型和用户培训对多次适配中所实现衰减一致性的影响。对30名佩戴定制耳塞和非定制耳塞的参与者,使用阈值处真耳衰减程序进行了衰减测量。受试者最初对正确的耳塞插入技术并不了解,随后在衰减测量的后半部分接受了一对一培训。使用(i)“到耳平均衰减距离”的标准差(一种适配不确定性的度量)和(ii)每个受试者多次适配测试中衰减值的标准差来评估适配的一致性或可靠性。在500、1000和2000Hz时,定制耳塞在衰减一致性方面在统计学上显著优于非定制耳塞。在250、500和1000Hz以及个人衰减评级方面,培训效果具有统计学意义。没有交互作用具有统计学意义。这些结果表明,总体而言,与非定制耳塞相比,受试者使用定制耳塞获得的衰减更一致,并且两种耳塞类型的一致性在经过培训后均有所提高。