Assistant professor, Department of Orthodontics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jan;143(1):101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.008.
The aim of this in-vivo study study was to evaluate the effect of excluding the liquid resin component of a composite bonding product that is based on bisphenol A diglycidylmethacrylate when bonding lingual retainers.
The material comprised 40 metal multistrand lingual retainers bonded onto the lingual surfaces of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. Transbond LR composite paste and liquid resin (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were used to bond retainers in the control group (20 retainers). The same bonding material was used in the test group (20 retainers), but the liquid resin component was excluded. The durations (in months) of retainer survival were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and the log rank test.
Fifty percent of the retainers in the control group and 60% of those in the test group had no bond failures during the 5-year observation period; the difference was not statistically significant. Bond failures were recorded in 13.6% of the bonded tooth surfaces in the control group and in 14.9% in the test group; the difference was not statistically significant. On average, the retainers stayed intact in the control and test groups for 36 and 32 months, respectively. The median survival times of the control and test groups were 43 months and more than 47 months, respectively. Neither the survival analysis nor the 95% confidence intervals (24-49 months in the control group, 24-40 months in the test group) suggested any statistically significant difference between the groups.
Metal lingual retainers can be successfully bonded without liquid resin and serve the patient equally as well clinically as retainers bonded with the conventional bonding technique.
本体内研究旨在评估当粘结舌侧保持器时,排除基于双酚 A 二缩水甘油基甲基丙烯酸酯的复合粘结产品的液体树脂成分对粘结效果的影响。
该材料包括 40 个金属多股舌侧保持器,粘结在上颌和下颌前牙的舌侧表面。Transbond LR 复合膏和液体树脂(3M Unitek,Monrovia,加利福尼亚州)用于对照组(20 个保持器)粘结保持器。测试组(20 个保持器)使用相同的粘结材料,但排除了液体树脂成分。使用 Kaplan-Meier 乘积限法和对数秩检验分析保持器的生存时间(以月为单位)。
在 5 年的观察期内,对照组中有 50%的保持器和测试组中有 60%的保持器没有粘结失败;差异无统计学意义。对照组中粘结牙面的粘结失败率为 13.6%,测试组为 14.9%;差异无统计学意义。平均而言,对照组和测试组的保持器分别完整保留 36 个月和 32 个月。对照组和测试组的中位生存时间分别为 43 个月和超过 47 个月。生存分析和 95%置信区间(对照组 24-49 个月,测试组 24-40 个月)均未显示两组之间存在统计学显著差异。
可以成功地不使用液体树脂粘结金属舌侧保持器,并且与使用传统粘结技术粘结的保持器一样,临床效果也很好。