Suppr超能文献

枪击死亡:尸检多层螺旋计算机断层扫描与尸检结果之间的相关性:一项为期30个月的回顾性研究。

Gunshot fatalities: correlation between post-mortem multi-slice computed tomography and autopsy findings: a 30-months retrospective study.

作者信息

Makhlouf F, Scolan V, Ferretti G, Stahl C, Paysant F

机构信息

Department of Legal Medicine, A. Michallon Hospital, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Leg Med (Tokyo). 2013 May;15(3):145-8. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Abstract

In this study we compared retrospectively the autopsy and the CT-scan findings in 47 gunshot victims (96 wounds) in order to assess the accuracy of the two methods in injury and ballistic diagnoses. Firing distance was determined in 46 wounds (47.9%). Firing range was determined by autopsy alone in 37 cases (80.5%) and by CT-scan alone in three cases (6.5%). In the six remaining cases (13%), autopsy and CT-scan reports concluded both to the same firing range. Entrance wounds were detected concordantly by both CT-scan and autopsy in 63 of the 91 penetrating wounds (69.2%). Exit wounds were present in 69 shots. They were concordantly detected by autopsy and CT-scan in 36 cases (52.2%). It was possible at CT imaging to determine the track of the bullet in up to 62 wounds (72.1%). CT-scan was superior to autopsy in determining two items: face fractures and pneumencephalon. CT scan was of limited value in demonstrating skull base fractures and contusions of the brain. There was good correspondence in demonstrating subarachnoid hemorrhage. CT-scan was accurate to demonstrate presence of gas, either in the pleural cavity (pneumothorax) or in the vessels' lumen (air embolism). Both autopsy and CT-scan were concordant in demonstrating thoracic well injuries, heart lacerations and intra thoracic hemorrhage. CT-scan was far below autopsy in detecting solid organs injuries except for kidneys. The present survey shows that CT-scan is second to none in demonstrating features as pneumencephalon, facial fractures, midline shifts, air embolism, pneumothorax, and pelvic bones fractures. It may contribute to determine the firing range in cases of contact-range and of intermediate range though the firing range assessment remains beyond post-mortem imaging possibilities, at least at the current state of knowledge.

摘要

在本研究中,我们回顾性比较了47例枪伤受害者(96处伤口)的尸检结果与CT扫描结果,以评估这两种方法在损伤和弹道诊断方面的准确性。确定了46处伤口(47.9%)的射击距离。射击范围仅通过尸检确定的有37例(80.5%),仅通过CT扫描确定的有3例(6.5%)。其余6例(13%)中,尸检和CT扫描报告得出的射击范围相同。在91处穿透伤中的63处(69.2%),CT扫描和尸检均一致检测到入口伤口。69枪中有出口伤口。尸检和CT扫描在36例(52.2%)中一致检测到出口伤口。在CT成像中,最多可在62处伤口(72.1%)中确定子弹轨迹。在确定两项内容方面,CT扫描优于尸检:面部骨折和气脑。CT扫描在显示颅底骨折和脑挫伤方面价值有限。在显示蛛网膜下腔出血方面有良好的一致性。CT扫描在显示胸腔积气(气胸)或血管腔内气体(空气栓塞)方面很准确。尸检和CT扫描在显示胸壁损伤、心脏撕裂伤和胸腔内出血方面一致。除肾脏外,CT扫描在检测实体器官损伤方面远不如尸检。本次调查表明,CT扫描在显示气脑、面部骨折、中线移位、空气栓塞、气胸和骨盆骨折等特征方面首屈一指。尽管至少在目前的知识水平下,射击范围评估仍超出死后成像的能力范围,但它可能有助于确定接触距离和中间距离情况下的射击范围。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验