Center for Neuropharmacology & Neuroscience, Albany Medical College, Department of Environmental Health & Safety (MC-96) Albany Medical Center 43 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Feb 1;444:298-310. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.096. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
Drugs in wastewater arise from many sources. For health care, these include excretion and direct disposal (bedside wasting). The present study reports on the dispensing and wasting of 15 controlled substances (CS) at two health care facilities in Albany, NY over a nearly two year period. The study considered measures of ecotoxicity, drug metabolism, excretion and disposal of these CS. Potential alternatives to flushing of CS into wastewaters from healthcare facilities are discussed. Drug medication and waste collection records (12,345) included: numbers of drugs dispensed, returned and wasted. Overall, 8528 g of 15 CS were wasted. Three (midazolam, acetaminophen-codeine and fentanyl) accounted for 87.5% of the total wasted. Wasting varied by hospital, 14 CS at the academic medical center hospital and 8 at the surgical care center were wasted. Liquids were more frequently wasted than tablets or pills. Some combination drugs (acetaminophen (APAP)-codeine) were frequently (50% of drug dispensed) wasted while others were less wasted (APAP-hydrocodone-6.3%; APAP-oxycodone-1.3%). The 8 CS judged more hazardous to aquatic life were: APAP-codeine, APAP-hydrocodone, APAP-oxycodone, alprazolam, diazepam, fentanyl, midazolam, and testosterone. Ketamine, morphine, oxycodone and zolpidem were of lesser acute toxicity based on available LC50 values. These CS might provide a therapeutically equivalent alternative to the more environmentally harmful drugs. In health care facilities, professionals dispose of CS by bedside wasting into water or other receptacles. This can be avoided by returning CS to the hospital's pharmacy department, thence to a licensed distributor. Study of this process of drug wasting can identify opportunities for process improvements. We found 3 CS (APAP-codeine, midazolam and testosterone) where ½ to 1/3 of the drug was wasted and 5 others with 30 to 13% wasted. Knowledge of the adverse impacts from the release of highly toxic drugs into the environment might influence CS selection and disposal alternatives.
废水中的药物来自许多来源。对于医疗保健,这些包括排泄和直接处置(床边浪费)。本研究报告了在纽约奥尔巴尼的两个医疗保健设施中,近两年来,15 种受控物质(CS)的配药和浪费情况。该研究考虑了这些 CS 的生态毒性、药物代谢、排泄和处置措施。讨论了从医疗保健设施中将 CS 冲入废水中的潜在替代方法。药物用药和废物收集记录(12345)包括:配药、退回和浪费的药物数量。总体而言,浪费了 8528 克 15 种 CS。其中三种(咪达唑仑、对乙酰氨基酚-可待因和芬太尼)占总浪费量的 87.5%。浪费情况因医院而异,学术医疗中心医院浪费了 14 种 CS,外科护理中心浪费了 8 种 CS。液体比片剂或药丸更频繁地被浪费。一些组合药物(对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)-可待因)经常被浪费(50%的药物配药),而其他药物则较少被浪费(APAP-氢可酮-6.3%;APAP-羟考酮-1.3%)。被认为对水生生物危害更大的 8 种 CS 是:APAP-可待因、APAP-氢可酮、APAP-羟考酮、阿普唑仑、地西泮、芬太尼、咪达唑仑和睾酮。根据现有 LC50 值,氯胺酮、吗啡、羟考酮和唑吡坦的急性毒性较小。这些 CS 可能为更具环境危害性的药物提供治疗等效替代品。在医疗保健设施中,专业人员通过床边浪费将 CS 排入水或其他容器中。通过将 CS 退回医院药房部门,然后再退回给持牌经销商,就可以避免这种情况。对药物浪费过程的研究可以确定改进流程的机会。我们发现 3 种 CS(APAP-可待因、咪达唑仑和睾酮)中浪费了 1/2 到 1/3 的药物,另外 5 种药物浪费了 30%到 13%。对高度有毒药物释放到环境中造成的不利影响的认识可能会影响 CS 的选择和处置替代品。