Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Jun;56(3):1009-22. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0252). Epub 2012 Dec 28.
To examine how adults with dyslexia versus adults with typical reading form lexical representations during pseudoword learning.
Twenty adults with dyslexia and 20 adults with typical reading learned meanings, spellings, and pronunciations of 16 pictured pseudowords, (half with regular and half with irregular grapheme-phoneme correspondences) presented first in 1 modality (spoken or written) and then the 2nd modality. Dependent measures included picture naming and identification, episodic recognition, a rhyme task, and a categorization task.
Adults with dyslexia learned pseudowords more slowly than those with typical reading and were disproportionately poor in learning irregularly spelled pseudowords after changing from written to spoken modality. Adults with dyslexia recognized fewer pseudoword forms than adults with typical reading and verified fewer pseudoword rhymes. Adults with typical reading were more accurate with categorizing regular versus irregular pseudowords. Adults with dyslexia did not show this regularity advantage.
Adults with dyslexia, compared with adults with typical reading, failed to (a) encode and retrieve detailed information about pseudoword forms, (b) efficiently form cross-modal associations between written and spoken encounters with pseudowords, and (c) effectively modify their representations following the change in modality. The authors discuss implications relative to common theories of dyslexia.
研究成人阅读障碍者与成人正常阅读者在假词学习过程中如何形成词汇表象。
20 名阅读障碍者和 20 名正常阅读者学习了 16 个图片假词的词义、拼写和发音,(一半具有规则的,一半具有不规则的字母-音素对应关系)首先以一种模态(口语或书面语)呈现,然后再以另一种模态呈现。依赖指标包括图片命名和识别、情节记忆识别、押韵任务和分类任务。
阅读障碍者比正常阅读者学习假词的速度慢,并且在从书面模态转换到口语模态后,对不规则拼写的假词学习较差。阅读障碍者识别的假词形式比正常阅读者少,验证的假词押韵也少。正常阅读者对分类规则与不规则假词更准确。阅读障碍者没有表现出这种规律性优势。
与正常阅读者相比,阅读障碍者(a)无法编码和检索有关假词形式的详细信息,(b)无法有效地在书面和口语遇到假词之间形成跨模态联系,(c)无法在模态改变后有效地修改其表示。作者讨论了与阅读障碍常见理论相关的含义。