Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Sanbon Hospital, Gunpo, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.013.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of anchor penetration of the far cortex of the glenoid neck after arthroscopic Bankart repair and to compare the biomechanical properties of anchors in the 4- and 5:30- to 6-o'clock positions on the glenoid.
Twelve (6 matched pairs) fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were used to simulate arthroscopic Bankart repair in the lateral decubitus position. The most inferior anchor (5:30 to 6 o'clock) and that above it (4 o'clock) were inserted via the anteroinferior portal on the glenoid using the standard technique. After both anchor insertions, anchor perforation of the glenoid far cortex was identified. Biomechanical properties were measured to determine cyclic displacement of anchors at 100 and 500 cycles, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate failure strength.
All 12 suture anchors (100%) at 5:30 to 6 o'clock penetrated throughout the far cortex, whereas only 4 anchors (33%) at 4 o'clock did so (P = .005). The mean distance the anchor tip traveled into far cortex was significantly longer at 5:30 to 6 o'clock than at 4 o'clock (6.8 ± 1.6 mm v 2.0 ± 1.6 mm, P = .001). In terms of mechanical strength, anchors at 5:30 to 6 o'clock had greater 100- and 500-cycle mean displacements than those at 4 o'clock (3.0 ± 0.5 mm v 2.5 ± 0.3 mm, P = .018 for 100 cycles; 3.5 ± 0.7 mm v 2.8 ± 0.3 mm, P = .018 for 500 cycles), although no differences in ultimate failure strength after cyclic loading were found between 2 positions (133.4 ± 40.3 and 133.7 ± 29.2 N, respectively; P = .985).
For arthroscopic Bankart repair, insertion of the most inferior anchor via the anteroinferior portal with standard technique, in the lateral decubitus position, carries a high risk of perforating the inferior far cortex of the glenoid (100% in our study). This may result in mechanical weakness of the most inferior repair specifically in the early postoperative period.
Perforation of the glenoid far cortex by the most inferior anchor and its mechanical weakness should be taken into consideration. Further study is needed to improve surgical technique to place the most inferior anchor in an optimal position by arthroscopy.
本研究旨在评估关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后肩胛盂颈远侧皮质锚钉穿透的发生率,并比较肩胛盂上 4 点和 5 点 30 分至 6 点位置处锚钉的生物力学性能。
本研究使用 12 具(6 对匹配)新鲜冷冻的人体尸体肩,在侧卧位下模拟关节镜下 Bankart 修复。通过肩胛盂的前下入口,使用标准技术将最下方的锚钉(5 点 30 分至 6 点)和其上方的锚钉(4 点)插入。在完成两次锚钉插入后,确定锚钉是否穿透肩胛盂远侧皮质。测量生物力学性能,以确定在 100 次和 500 次循环时锚钉的循环位移、刚度、屈服载荷和极限失效强度。
所有 12 个缝线锚钉(100%)在 5 点 30 分至 6 点处均穿透远皮质,而仅有 4 个锚钉(33%)在 4 点处穿透(P=.005)。锚钉尖端进入远皮质的平均距离在 5 点 30 分至 6 点明显长于 4 点(6.8±1.6mm比 2.0±1.6mm,P=.001)。在机械强度方面,5 点 30 分至 6 点的锚钉在 100 次和 500 次循环时的平均位移均大于 4 点(100 次循环时 3.0±0.5mm比 2.5±0.3mm,P=.018;500 次循环时 3.5±0.7mm比 2.8±0.3mm,P=.018),但在循环加载后,两个位置的极限失效强度没有差异(分别为 133.4±40.3N和 133.7±29.2N;P=.985)。
在关节镜下 Bankart 修复中,采用标准技术通过前下入口将最下方的锚钉插入,存在穿透肩胛盂远侧皮质的高风险(本研究中为 100%)。这可能导致最下方修复的机械强度减弱,特别是在术后早期。
应考虑最下方锚钉穿透肩胛盂远侧皮质及其机械强度减弱的问题。需要进一步研究以通过关节镜改善手术技术,将最下方的锚钉置于最佳位置。