Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A..
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2019 Oct;35(10):2795-2800. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
To characterize the additive effect of a 6-o'clock anchor in the stabilization of a Bankart lesion.
Twelve cadaveric shoulders were tested on a 6-df robotic musculoskeletal simulator to measure the peak resistance force due to anterior displacement of 1 cm. The rotator cuff muscles were loaded dynamically. The test conditions consisted of the intact shoulder, Bankart lesion, Bankart repair (3-, 4-, and 5-o'clock anchors), and Bankart repair with the addition of a 6-o'clock anchor. A 13% anterior bone defect was then created, and all conditions were repeated. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed.
In the group with no bone loss, the addition of a 6-o'clock anchor yielded the highest peak resistance force (52.8 N; standard deviation [SD], 4.5 N), and its peak force was significantly greater than that of the standard Bankart repair by 15.8% (7.2 N, P = .003). With subcritical glenoid bone loss, the repair with the addition of a 6-o'clock anchor (peak force, 52.6 N; SD, 6.1 N; P = .006) had a significantly higher peak resistance force than the group with bone loss with a Bankart lesion (35.2 N; SD, 5.8 N). Although the 6-o'clock anchor did increase the strength of the standard repair by 6.7%, this was not statistically significant (P = .9) in the bone loss model.
The addition of a 6-o'clock suture anchor to a 3-anchor Bankart repair increases the peak resistance force to displacement in a biomechanical model, although this effect is lost with subcritical bone loss.
This study provides surgeons with essential biomechanical data to aid in the selection of the repair configuration.
研究六点锚定在稳定 Bankart 损伤中的附加作用。
在六自由度机器人运动生物力学模拟器上测试 12 个尸体肩部,以测量 1cm 前向移位的峰值阻力。动态加载肩袖肌肉。测试条件包括完整肩部、Bankart 损伤、Bankart 修复(3、4 和 5 点锚定)以及 Bankart 修复加六点锚定。然后创建 13%的前骨缺损,并重复所有条件。进行重复测量方差分析。
在无骨丢失组中,六点锚的附加作用产生了最高的峰值阻力(52.8N;标准偏差[SD],4.5N),其峰值力比标准 Bankart 修复高 15.8%(7.2N,P=0.003)。在亚临界关节盂骨丢失的情况下,六点锚附加修复(峰值力 52.6N;SD,6.1N;P=0.006)的峰值阻力明显高于 Bankart 病变骨丢失组(35.2N;SD,5.8N)。尽管六点锚将标准修复的强度提高了 6.7%,但在骨丢失模型中,这并没有统计学意义(P=0.9)。
在生物力学模型中,三点锚定 Bankart 修复加六点缝线锚定增加了峰值阻力,尽管在亚临界骨丢失时这种效果消失。
这项研究为外科医生提供了必要的生物力学数据,以帮助选择修复配置。