Materials and Simulation Process Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2012 Dec 28;137(24):244507. doi: 10.1063/1.4771974.
We present the absolute enthalpy, entropy, heat capacity, and free energy of liquid water at ambient conditions calculated by the two-phase thermodynamic method applied to ab initio, reactive and classical molecular dynamics simulations. We find that the absolute entropy and heat capacity of liquid water from ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) is underestimated, but falls within the range of the flexible empirical as well as the reactive force fields. The origin of the low absolute entropy of liquid water from AIMD simulations is due to an underestimation of the translational entropy by 20% and the rotational entropy by 40% compared to the TIP3P classical water model, consistent with previous studies that reports low diffusivity and increased ordering of liquid water from AIMD simulations. Classical MD simulations with rigid water models tend to be in better agreement with experiment (in particular TIP3P yielding the best agreement), although the TIP4P-ice water model, the only empirical force field that reproduces the experimental melting temperature, has the lowest entropy, perhaps expectedly. This reiterates the limitations of existing empirical water models in simultaneously capturing the thermodynamics of solid and liquid phases. We find that the quantum corrections to heat capacity of water can be as large as 60%. Although certain water models are computed to yield good absolute free energies of water compared to experiments, they are often due to the fortuitous enthalpy-entropy cancellation, but not necessarily due to the correct descriptions of enthalpy and entropy separately.
我们提出了在环境条件下通过两相热力学方法应用于从头算、反应和经典分子动力学模拟计算得到的液态水的绝对焓、熵、热容和自由能。我们发现,从头算分子动力学(AIMD)得到的液态水的绝对熵和热容被低估,但在柔性经验和反应力场的范围内。AIMD 模拟中液态水的低绝对熵的原因是与 TIP3P 经典水模型相比,平移熵低估了 20%,旋转熵低估了 40%,这与先前的研究一致,该研究报告了 AIMD 模拟中液体水扩散率低和有序度增加。刚性水模型的经典 MD 模拟往往与实验更吻合(特别是 TIP3P 吻合得最好),尽管 TIP4P-冰模型是唯一能重现实验熔化温度的经验力场,但它的熵最低,也许是意料之中的。这再次强调了现有经验水模型在同时捕捉固液两相热力学方面的局限性。我们发现,水的热容的量子修正可能高达 60%。尽管某些水模型被计算为与实验相比具有较好的水的绝对自由能,但这往往是由于焓熵的偶然抵消,而不一定是由于对焓和熵的正确描述。