Suppr超能文献

结扎加血管收缩剂与质子泵抑制剂治疗急性食管静脉曲张出血的对照试验。

Controlled trial of ligation plus vasoconstrictor versus proton pump inhibitor in the control of acute esophageal variceal bleeding.

机构信息

Department of Medical Research, Digestive Center, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;28(4):684-9. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12107.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic therapy combined with vasoconstrictor was generally recommended to treat acute variceal bleeding. However, up to 30% of patients may still encounter treatment failure.

OBJECTIVES

This trial was to evaluate the efficacy of combination with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) infusion in patients with acute variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients presenting with acute esophageal variceal bleeding were rescued by emergency EVL. Soon after arresting of bleeding varices, eligible subjects were randomized to two groups. Vasoconstrictor group received either somatostatin or terlipressin infusion. PPI group received either omeprazole or pantoprazole. End points were initial hemostasis, very early rebleeding rate, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled in vasoconstrictor group and 58 patients in PPI group. Both groups were comparable in baseline data. Initial hemostasis was achieved in 98% in vasoconstrictor group and 100% in PPI group (P = 1.0). Very early rebleeding within 48-120 h occurred in one patient (2%) in vasoconstrictor group and one patient (2%) in the PPI group (P = 1.0). Treatment failure was 4% in vasoconstrictor group and 2% in PPI group (P = 0.95). Adverse events occurred in 33 patients (55%) in vasoconstrictor group and three patients (6%) in PPI group (P < 0.001). Two patients in vasoconstrictor group and one patient in PPI group encountered esophageal ulcer bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

After successful control of acute variceal bleeding by EVL, adjuvant therapy with PPI infusion was similar to combination with vasoconstrictor infusion in terms of initial hemostasis, very early rebleeding rate, and associated with fewer adverse events.

摘要

背景

内镜治疗联合血管收缩剂通常被推荐用于治疗急性静脉曲张出血。然而,高达 30%的患者可能仍会出现治疗失败。

目的

本试验旨在评估内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)联合质子泵抑制剂(PPI)输注治疗急性静脉曲张出血患者的疗效。

方法

肝硬化患者因急性食管静脉曲张出血接受紧急 EVL 抢救。出血静脉曲张停止后,合格的患者随机分为两组。血管收缩剂组接受生长抑素或特利加压素输注。PPI 组接受奥美拉唑或泮托拉唑。终点是初始止血、早期再出血率和不良事件。

结果

血管收缩剂组纳入 60 例患者,PPI 组纳入 58 例患者。两组基线资料无差异。血管收缩剂组初始止血率为 98%,PPI 组为 100%(P=1.0)。血管收缩剂组 1 例(2%)和 PPI 组 1 例(2%)在 48-120 小时内出现早期再出血(P=1.0)。血管收缩剂组治疗失败 4%,PPI 组 2%(P=0.95)。血管收缩剂组 33 例(55%)和 PPI 组 3 例(6%)出现不良事件(P<0.001)。血管收缩剂组 2 例和 PPI 组 1 例出现食管溃疡出血。

结论

EVL 成功控制急性静脉曲张出血后,PPI 输注辅助治疗与血管收缩剂输注在初始止血、早期再出血率方面相似,且不良事件发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验