Suppr超能文献

特利加压素与奥曲肽用于内镜下套扎术辅助治疗出血性食管静脉曲张:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验

Terlipressin vs. octreotide in bleeding esophageal varices as an adjuvant therapy with endoscopic band ligation: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Abid Shahab, Jafri Wasim, Hamid Saeed, Salih Mohammad, Azam Zahid, Mumtaz Khalid, Shah Hasnain Ali, Abbas Zaigham

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):617-23. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.147. Epub 2009 Feb 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Data are scarce on the head-to-head efficacy of terlipressin and octreotide as an adjuvant therapy to endoscopic management of variceal bleed. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of terlipressin with octreotide as an adjuvant therapy to endoscopic variceal band ligation in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal bleed were randomized on admission to receive terlipressin (group A) or octreotide (group B) along with the placebo in the other arm in a double-blind fashion. The two groups were compared for efficacy, safety, overall survival, and length of hospital stay. "Control of variceal bleed" was the measure of efficacy of terlipressin and octreotide. Factors predicting length of stay were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 324 patients were enrolled; 163 in the terlipressin group (group A) and 161 in the octreotide group (group B). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable for age, gender, etiology of cirrhosis, hemoglobin at presentation, and Child-Pugh class, except that active bleed was seen during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the time of enrollment in 26 (16%) and 41 (25.5%) patients in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.034). Overall sixteen patients died (three failure to control bleed and thirteen from causes other than variceal bleed); nine in group A (5.5%) and seven (4.3%) in group B (P=0.626). In the intention to treat analysis, "control of variceal bleed" was noted in 305 patients (94.13%); 151 (92.63%) patients in group A and 154 (95.6%) patients in group B (confidence interval: 0.219-1.492). Packed cell transfusions in group A were 3.7+/-2.3 units, whereas in group B there were 3.9+/-2.5 units (P=0.273). Length of hospital stay in groups A and B was 108.40+/-34.81 and 126.39+/-47.45 h, respectively (P< or =0.001). No cardiovascular side effects were observed in either group. High pulse, low hemoglobin, prothrombin time, blood in nasogastric aspirate, and portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) were predictors of prolonged hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of terlipressin was not inferior to octreotide as an adjuvant therapy for the control of esophageal variceal bleed and in-hospital survival. The length of hospital stay in the terlipressin group was significantly shorter but not of any clinical importance. The predictors of prolonged hospital stay were low hemoglobin, high pulse, prolonged prothrombin time, blood at nasogastric aspirate, and PSE.

摘要

目的

关于特利加压素和奥曲肽作为内镜治疗静脉曲张出血辅助疗法的直接疗效数据较少。本研究的目的是比较特利加压素与奥曲肽作为内镜下食管静脉曲张套扎术辅助疗法治疗食管静脉曲张出血患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

食管静脉曲张出血的肝硬化患者入院时随机分组,以双盲方式在一组接受特利加压素(A组)或奥曲肽(B组)治疗,另一组接受安慰剂治疗。比较两组的疗效、安全性、总生存率和住院时间。“静脉曲张出血的控制”是特利加压素和奥曲肽疗效的衡量指标。还评估了预测住院时间的因素。

结果

共纳入324例患者;特利加压素组(A组)163例,奥曲肽组(B组)161例。两组的基线特征在年龄、性别、肝硬化病因、就诊时血红蛋白和Child-Pugh分级方面具有可比性,只是在入组时,A组和B组分别有26例(16%)和41例(25.5%)患者在上消化道内镜检查时出现活动性出血(P=0.034)。共有16例患者死亡(3例出血未控制,13例死于静脉曲张出血以外的原因);A组9例(5.5%),B组7例(4.3%)(P=0.626)。在意向性分析中,305例患者(94.13%)实现了“静脉曲张出血的控制”;A组151例(92.63%),B组154例(95.6%)(置信区间:0.219 - 1.492)。A组的红细胞压积输注量为3.7±2.3单位,而B组为3.9±2.5单位(P=0.273)。A组和B组的住院时间分别为108.40±34.81小时和126.39±47.45小时(P≤0.001)。两组均未观察到心血管副作用。高脉搏、低血红蛋白、凝血酶原时间、胃管抽吸物中有血以及门体性脑病(PSE)是住院时间延长的预测因素。

结论

作为控制食管静脉曲张出血和住院生存的辅助疗法,特利加压素的疗效不劣于奥曲肽。特利加压素组的住院时间明显较短,但无任何临床意义。住院时间延长的预测因素为低血红蛋白、高脉搏、凝血酶原时间延长、胃管抽吸物中有血以及PSE。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验