Pratt Bridget, Loff Bebe
Bioethics. 2014 Oct;28(8):387-96. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12009. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
How international research might contribute to justice in global health has not been substantively addressed by bioethics. Theories of justice from political philosophy establish obligations for parties from high-income countries owed to parties from low and middle-income countries. We have developed a new framework that is based on Jennifer Ruger's health capability paradigm to strengthen the link between international clinical research and justice in global health. The 'research for health justice' framework provides direction on three aspects of international clinical research: the research target, research capacity strengthening, and post-trial benefits. It identifies the obligations of justice owed by national governments, research funders, research sponsors, and investigators to trial participants and host communities. These obligations vary from those currently articulated in international research ethics guidelines. Ethical requirements of a different kind are needed if international clinical research is to advance global health equity.
生物伦理学尚未实质性地探讨国际研究如何促进全球卫生领域的公平正义。政治哲学中的正义理论确立了高收入国家各方对低收入和中等收入国家各方应尽的义务。我们基于珍妮弗·鲁格的健康能力范式开发了一个新框架,以加强国际临床研究与全球卫生公平正义之间的联系。“健康正义研究”框架为国际临床研究的三个方面提供了指导:研究目标、研究能力加强和试验后受益。它明确了各国政府、研究资助者、研究主办方和研究者对试验参与者及东道社区应尽的公平正义义务。这些义务与国际研究伦理准则目前所阐明的义务有所不同。要使国际临床研究促进全球卫生公平,就需要不同类型的伦理要求。