Bailey Lucy, Moreno Laura, Manigold Tobias, Krasniqi Sebastian, Kropshofer Harald, Hinton Heather, Singer Thomas, Suter Laura, Hansel Trevor T, Mitchell Jane A
Cardiothoracic Pharmacology, National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College, London, UK.
Non-Clinical Safety, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2013 Sep-Oct;68(2):231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2012.12.003. Epub 2012 Dec 29.
In 2006 the anti-CD28 superagonistic IgG4 TGN1412, having passed pre-clinical safety screens, caused a severe 'cytokine storm' in 6 healthy volunteers. Others have shown that for TGN1412 to induce an inflammatory signal in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or in human diluted blood, endothelial cells or bound monoclonal antibody (mAb) is required as part of a bioassay complex. These types of protocols rely on different donor cells and therefore have limitations as bioassays for pre-clinical testing.
We performed studies using human PBMC/endothelial cell co-cultures, whole blood/endothelial cell co-cultures and human whole blood alone. We bracketed responses of a CD28 superagonist antibody with mAbs against CD52 (alemtuzumab, MabCampath-1H) or epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab, Erbitux) and with the immunostimulant lipopolysaccharide. We detected cytokine responses at the level of protein release (using ELISAs and Luminex assays) and gene induction (using real-time PCR arrays).
Here we confirm that IL-8 release was induced in a mixed endothelial cell-PBMC system by the anti-CD28 mAb. We go on to show that an alemtuzumab and an anti-CD28 mAb, but not cetuximab induced the release of a range of cytokines including IL-8, IL-6, IFNγ, IL-2 and IL10 after 24h and induced cytokine gene induction after 1h. Co-cultures of whole blood and HUVECS showed larger variability but no superiority over whole blood alone at a range of time points (0.5-48h).
We suggest that, whilst limitations exist, human blood-based in vitro assays may prove useful in assessing the potential of mAbs and other biotherapeutics to cause release of cytokines in humans.
2006年,抗CD28超激动性IgG4抗体TGN1412在通过临床前安全性筛查后,在6名健康志愿者身上引发了严重的“细胞因子风暴”。其他人已经表明,TGN1412要在人外周血单核细胞(PBMC)或人稀释血液中诱导炎症信号,内皮细胞或结合的单克隆抗体(mAb)作为生物测定复合物的一部分是必需的。这些类型的方案依赖于不同供体的细胞,因此作为临床前测试的生物测定存在局限性。
我们使用人PBMC/内皮细胞共培养物、全血/内皮细胞共培养物和单独的人全血进行了研究。我们将CD28超激动剂抗体的反应与抗CD52(阿仑单抗,MabCampath-1H)或表皮生长因子受体(西妥昔单抗,爱必妥)的单克隆抗体以及免疫刺激剂脂多糖进行了对比。我们在蛋白质释放水平(使用酶联免疫吸附测定法和Luminex测定法)和基因诱导水平(使用实时PCR阵列)检测细胞因子反应。
在此我们证实,抗CD28单克隆抗体在混合的内皮细胞-PBMC系统中诱导了IL-8的释放。我们接着表明,阿仑单抗和抗CD28单克隆抗体,但不是西妥昔单抗,在24小时后诱导了一系列细胞因子的释放,包括IL-8、IL-6、IFNγ,、IL-2和IL10,并在1小时后诱导了细胞因子基因的诱导。全血与脐静脉内皮细胞的共培养物显示出更大的变异性,但在一系列时间点(0.5 - 48小时)并不比单独的全血更具优势。
我们认为,虽然存在局限性,但基于人血的体外测定可能证明在评估单克隆抗体和其他生物治疗药物在人体内引起细胞因子释放的潜力方面是有用的。