• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿创伤患者初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的预测价值

Predictive value of initial Glasgow coma scale score in pediatric trauma patients.

作者信息

Cicero Mark X, Cross Keith P

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b52bf.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b52bf
PMID:23283262
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and the Glasgow motor component (GMC) for overall mortality, death on arrival, and major injury and the relationship between GCS and length of stay (LOS) in the emergency department (ED) and hospital.

METHODS

Records from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Base from 2007 to 2009 were extracted. Patients 0 to 18 years old transported from a trauma scene with complete initial scene data were included. Statistical analysis, including construction of receiver-operator curves, determined the correlation between GCS, GMC, and the clinical outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

There were 104,035 records with complete data for analysis, including 3946 deaths. Mean patient age was 12.6 (SD, 5.5) years. Glasgow coma scale was predictive of overall mortality, with area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) of 0.946 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.941-0.951); death on arrival, with AUC of 0.958 (95% CI, 0.953-0.963); and risk of major injury, with AUC of 0.720 (0.715-0.724). Lower GCS scores were associated with shorter ED LOS and longer hospital stays (P <0.001, analysis of variance) except GCS 3, associated with shorter hospitalizations. For predicting overall mortality, the AUC for GMC was 0.940 (95% CI, 0.935-0.945), and for predicting major injury, the AUC was 0.681 (95% CI, 0.677-0.686).

CONCLUSIONS

For pediatric trauma victims, the GCS is predictive of mortality and injury outcomes, as well as both ED and hospital LOS, and has excellent prognostic accuracy. The GMC has predictive value for injury and mortality that is nearly equivalent to the full GCS.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和格拉斯哥运动评分(GMC)对总体死亡率、入院时死亡、严重损伤的预测价值,以及GCS与急诊科(ED)和医院住院时间(LOS)之间的关系。

方法

提取2007年至2009年美国外科医师学会国家创伤数据库的记录。纳入从创伤现场转运的0至18岁且初始现场数据完整的患者。包括绘制受试者工作特征曲线在内的统计分析确定了GCS、GMC与感兴趣的临床结局之间的相关性。

结果

有104,035条记录具有完整数据用于分析,包括3946例死亡。患者平均年龄为12.6(标准差,5.5)岁。格拉斯哥昏迷量表可预测总体死亡率,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.946(95%置信区间[CI],0.941 - 0.951);入院时死亡,AUC为0.958(95%CI,0.953 - 0.963);严重损伤风险,AUC为0.720(0.715 - 0.724)。较低的GCS评分与较短的急诊科住院时间和较长的医院住院时间相关(P<0.001,方差分析),但GCS 3分与较短的住院时间相关。对于预测总体死亡率,GMC的AUC为0.940(95%CI,0.935 - 0.945),对于预测严重损伤,AUC为0.681(95%CI,0.677 - 0.686)。

结论

对于儿童创伤受害者,GCS可预测死亡率和损伤结局,以及急诊科和医院的住院时间,且具有出色的预后准确性。GMC对损伤和死亡率的预测价值几乎等同于完整的GCS。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of initial Glasgow coma scale score in pediatric trauma patients.小儿创伤患者初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的预测价值
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):43-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b52bf.
2
The predictive value of field versus arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score and TRISS calculations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.现场与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分及创伤和损伤严重度评分计算在中重度创伤性脑损伤中的预测价值。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):985-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205860.96209.1c.
3
Independent application of the Sacco Disaster Triage Method to pediatric trauma patients.Sacco 灾难分诊法在儿科创伤患者中的独立应用。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Aug;27(4):306-11. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12000866. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
4
A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale score to simplified alternative scores for the prediction of traumatic brain injury outcomes.格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与简化替代评分在预测创伤性脑损伤结局方面的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;45(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.07.429.
5
Early prediction of posttraumatic in-hospital mortality in pediatric patients.小儿创伤患者院内死亡的早期预测
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(5):439-44. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181aad60f.
6
A comparison of the prehospital motor component of the Glasgow coma scale (mGCS) to the prehospital total GCS (tGCS) as a prehospital risk adjustment measure for trauma patients.院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(mGCS)的运动成分与院前总格拉斯哥昏迷量表(tGCS)的比较,作为创伤患者的院前风险调整措施。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):68-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.844870.
7
The Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG) and Prediction of Mortality Outcome in Adult Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Based on Registered Trauma Data.反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分(rSIG)与成人创伤患者死亡率预测的关系:基于注册创伤数据的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 24;15(11):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112346.
8
Does a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score predict pediatric outcomes?院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分能否预测小儿预后?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Oct;28(10):1027-32. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31826cac31.
9
Glasgow motor scale alone is equivalent to Glasgow Coma Scale at identifying children at risk for serious traumatic brain injury.仅格拉斯哥运动量表在识别有严重创伤性脑损伤风险的儿童方面等同于格拉斯哥昏迷量表。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Aug;77(2):304-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000300.
10
Head-to-head comparison of disaster triage methods in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients.在儿科、成人和老年患者中灾难分诊方法的头对头比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;61(6):668-676.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.12.023. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in a Tertiary Regional Trauma Center in the Philippines.菲律宾一家三级区域创伤中心小儿创伤性脑损伤患者的临床特征与预后
Neurotrauma Rep. 2025 Mar 6;6(1):251-256. doi: 10.1089/neur.2025.0002. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of etiological and clinical characteristics on the rehabilitation process and functional gains in pediatric severe acquired brain injury.病因及临床特征对小儿重度获得性脑损伤康复进程及功能恢复的影响
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 26;71(1):74-82. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.14479. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients: a multicenter study.
比较九种创伤评分系统在预测儿科创伤患者住院结局中的作用:一项多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 1;14(1):7646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4.
4
Predicting Length of Stay After Thoracolumbar Trauma: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis.胸腰椎创伤后住院时间的预测:一项单中心回顾性分析。
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):417-426. doi: 10.14444/8242.
5
National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021.国家受伤患者现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家小组 2021 年的建议。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2):e49-e60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003627. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
6
Pediatric traumatic brain injury: Resource utilization and outcomes at adult versus pediatric trauma centers.小儿创伤性脑损伤:成人与小儿创伤中心的资源利用及治疗结果
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Jan 6;7:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2021.12.002. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Trauma Scores and Their Prognostic Value for the Outcome Following Pediatric Polytrauma.创伤评分及其对小儿多发伤预后的预测价值
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 3;9:721585. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.721585. eCollection 2021.
8
Trauma care and capture rate of variables of World Health Organisation data set for injury at regional hospitals in Tanzania: first steps to a national trauma registry.坦桑尼亚地区医院创伤护理和世界卫生组织数据集损伤变量的捕获率:国家创伤登记处的第一步。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00325-y.
9
Pediatric Head Trauma.小儿头部创伤
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2015 Mar;4(1):47-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554989.
10
Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Poor Hospital Discharge Outcome for Young Children with Abusive Head Trauma.虐待性头部创伤幼儿出院结局不佳的临床特征及预测因素
J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 20;8(3):390. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030390.