Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jan 2;95(1):48-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01116.
Aseptic loosening is the most common cause for revision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and is associated with failure of the bone-cement or cement-implant interface. The purpose of the present study was to analyze different bone lavage techniques for the bone-cement and cement-implant interfaces of the femoral component and to study the effect of these techniques on cement penetration and on interface temperature.
In an experimental cadaver study, Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was performed in twenty-four matched-paired knees to study the effect of pulsed lavage compared with syringe lavage on femoral cement penetration and interface temperature. Interface temperature, cement penetration pressure, and ligament tension forces were measured continuously during the procedure, and cement penetration was determined by performing sagittal bone cuts.
Cleansing the femoral bone stock with use of pulsed lavage (Group B) led to increased femoral cement penetration (mean, 1428 mm²; 95% confidence interval, 1348 to 1508 mm²) compared with syringe lavage (Group A) (mean, 1128 mm²; 95% confidence interval, 1038 to 1219 mm²) (p < 0.001). Interface temperature was higher in Group B (mean 22.6°C; 95% confidence interval, 20.5°C to 24.1°C) than in Group A (mean, 21.0°C; 95% confidence interval, 19.4°C to 23.0°C) (p = 0.028), but temperatures never reached critical values for thermal damage to the bone.
Pulsed lavage leads to an increased femoral cement penetration without the risk of heat necrosis at the bone-cement interface.
无菌性松动是翻修单间室膝关节置换术最常见的原因,与骨-水泥或水泥-假体界面的失败有关。本研究的目的是分析不同的骨冲洗技术对股骨假体的骨-水泥和水泥-假体界面,并研究这些技术对水泥渗透和界面温度的影响。
在一项实验性尸体研究中,对 24 对匹配的膝关节进行了牛津单间室膝关节置换术,以研究脉冲冲洗与注射器冲洗对股骨水泥渗透和界面温度的影响。在手术过程中连续测量界面温度、水泥渗透压力和韧带张力,通过进行矢状骨切割来确定水泥渗透。
与注射器冲洗(A 组)相比,使用脉冲冲洗清洁股骨骨(B 组)可增加股骨水泥渗透(平均 1428mm²;95%置信区间,1348 至 1508mm²)(p <0.001)。B 组的界面温度较高(平均 22.6°C;95%置信区间,20.5°C 至 24.1°C),高于 A 组(平均 21.0°C;95%置信区间,19.4°C 至 23.0°C)(p = 0.028),但温度从未达到对骨热损伤的临界值。
脉冲冲洗可增加股骨水泥渗透,而不会增加骨-水泥界面的热坏死风险。