Sannino G, Gloria F, Ottria L, Barlattani A
University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Department of Odontostomatological Science.
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2009 Apr;2(2):14-27. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
The aim of this study was to evaluate, by finite element analysis (FEA), the influence of finish line on stress distribution and resistance to the loads of a ZrO(2) crown and porcelain in implant-supported.
The object of this analysis consisted of a fxture, an abutment, a passing screw, a layer of cement, a framework crown, a feldspatic porcelain veneering. The abutment's marginal design was used in 3 different types of preparation: feather edge, slight chamfer and 50°, each of them was of 1 mm depth over the entire circumference. The ZrO(2)Y-TZP coping was 0.6 mm thick. Two material matching for the abutment and the framework was used for the simulations: ZrO(2) framework and ZrO(2) abutment, ZrO(2) framework and T abutment. A 600 N axial force distributed over the entire surface of the crown was applied. The numerical simulations with finite elements were used to verify the different distribution of equivalent von Mises stress for three different geometries of abutment and framework.
Slight chamfer on the matching ZrO(2) - ZrO(2) is the geometry with minimum equivalent stress of von Mises. Even for T abutment and ZrO(2) framework slight chamfer is the best configuration to minimize the localized stress. Geometry that has the highest average stress is one with abutment at 50°, we see a downward trend for all three configurations using only zirconium for both components.
Finite element analysis. performed for the manifacturing of implant-supported crown, gives exact geometric guide lines about the choice of chamfer preparation, while the analysis of other marginal geometries suggests a possible improved behavior of the mating between ZrO(2) abutment and ZrO(2) coping. for three different geometries of the abutment and the coping.
本研究旨在通过有限元分析(FEA)评估肩台对种植体支持的ZrO₂全冠及瓷层应力分布和抗载荷能力的影响。
该分析对象包括种植体、基台、连接螺丝、一层粘结剂、基底冠、长石质瓷贴面。基台边缘设计采用3种不同类型的预备方式:羽状边缘、浅凹形和50°肩台,每种在整个圆周上深度均为1mm。ZrO₂ Y-TZP基底冠厚度为0.6mm。模拟采用两种基台与基底的材料匹配方式:ZrO₂基底与ZrO₂基台、ZrO₂基底与钛基台。在全冠整个表面施加600N轴向力。采用有限元数值模拟验证三种不同基台与基底几何形状下等效应力的不同分布。
ZrO₂ -ZrO₂匹配时浅凹形肩台具有最小的等效应力。即使对于钛基台和ZrO₂基底,浅凹形也是使局部应力最小化的最佳构型。平均应力最高的几何形状是50°肩台,对于两种部件均仅使用锆的所有三种构型,我们看到一种下降趋势。
对种植体支持全冠制造进行的有限元分析,给出了关于肩台预备选择的确切几何指导方针,而对其他边缘几何形状的分析表明ZrO₂基台与ZrO₂基底之间的匹配可能具有更好的性能,针对基台和基底的三种不同几何形状。