Kojiya Haneda Healthcare Service, Ota City Public Health Office, Tokyo, Japan.
Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Oct;141(10):2224-34. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812002907. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
The incidence of active tuberculosis (TB) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in inmates and prison staff is higher than that in the general population. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) provide more accurate diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection with higher specificity than the tuberculin skin test (TST). To assess the cost effectiveness of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT) compared to TST, TST followed by QFT and chest X-ray, we constructed Markov models using a societal perspective on the lifetime horizon. The main outcome measure of effectiveness was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness was compared. The QFT-alone strategy was the most cost-effective for entry TB screening in prisons in developed countries. Cost-effectiveness was not sensitive to the rates of BCG vaccination, LTBI, TB, HIV infection and multidrug-resistant TB. Entry TB screening using an IGRA in prisons should be considered on the basis of its cost-effectiveness by public health intervention.
囚犯和监狱工作人员的活动性结核病(TB)和潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)发病率高于一般人群。结核分枝杆菌特异性干扰素-γ释放测定(IGRAs)比结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)提供了更准确的结核分枝杆菌感染诊断,具有更高的特异性。为了评估与 TST、TST 后加用 QFT 和胸部 X 线相比,QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube(QFT)在成本效益方面的优势,我们使用终生时间范围从社会角度构建了 Markov 模型。有效性的主要衡量标准是获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs)。比较了增量成本效益。对于发达国家监狱的初始 TB 筛查,单独使用 QFT 策略是最具成本效益的。成本效益对卡介苗接种率、LTBI、TB、HIV 感染和耐多药 TB 的比率不敏感。基于其公共卫生干预的成本效益,应该考虑在监狱中使用 IGRA 进行初始 TB 筛查。