• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分对去骨瓣减压术后大脑中动脉恶性梗死患者结局的预测价值。

Preoperative APACHE II and GCS scores as predictors of outcomes in patients with malignant MCA infarction after decompressive hemicraniectomy.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Tri Service General Hospital, Taiwan, China.

出版信息

Neurol India. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):608-12. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.105195.

DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.105195
PMID:23287323
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Decompressive hemicraniectomy is accepted as the most effective life-saving treatment for malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. However, the outcome remains hard to predict. This study examined the efficacy of using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores before emergency craniectomy for predicting clinical outcome in malignant MCA infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients with malignant MCA infarction treated from January 2006 to October 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The GCS and APACHE II scores within the first 24 h of neurological deterioration or before decompressive hemicraniectomy, were used to predict short-term functional outcome rated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained to determine the accuracy and best cut-off value for each scoring system.

RESULTS

At 6 months, there was dramatic life-saving effect of surgery, with a significant reduction in mortality rate (from 71% to 19%, P < 0.001). After the ROC analysis, cut-off values of pre-operative GCS > 8 (P = 0.003) and APACHE II <13 (P = 0.006) were sufficiently sensitive and specific to predict favorable outcome (mRS 0-3).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative GCS and APACHE II scores are useful tools in predicting outcomes for patients with malignant MCA infarction who underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy.

摘要

目的

去骨瓣减压术被认为是治疗恶性大脑中动脉(MCA)梗死最有效的救生治疗方法。然而,其预后仍然难以预测。本研究探讨了在紧急去骨瓣减压术前使用格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)和急性生理学与慢性健康评估(APACHE)Ⅱ评分预测恶性 MCA 梗死患者临床预后的疗效。

材料和方法

回顾性分析了 2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 10 月期间连续收治的 79 例恶性 MCA 梗死患者。使用神经恶化或去骨瓣减压术前 24 小时内的 GCS 和 APACHE II 评分预测改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分的短期功能预后。获得受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以确定每个评分系统的准确性和最佳截断值。

结果

6 个月时,手术具有显著的救生效果,死亡率显著降低(从 71%降至 19%,P<0.001)。经过 ROC 分析,术前 GCS>8(P=0.003)和 APACHE II<13(P=0.006)的截断值具有足够的敏感性和特异性,可以预测良好的预后(mRS 0-3)。

结论

术前 GCS 和 APACHE II 评分是预测行去骨瓣减压术的恶性 MCA 梗死患者预后的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Preoperative APACHE II and GCS scores as predictors of outcomes in patients with malignant MCA infarction after decompressive hemicraniectomy.术前急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分对去骨瓣减压术后大脑中动脉恶性梗死患者结局的预测价值。
Neurol India. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):608-12. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.105195.
2
Factors predictive of fatality in massive middle cerebral artery territory infarction and clinical experience of decompressive hemicraniectomy.大脑中动脉大面积梗死致死的预测因素及去骨瓣减压术的临床经验
Eur J Neurol. 2006 Jul;13(7):765-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01365.x.
3
Nationwide survey of decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in Japan.日本全国范围内关于恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压性颅骨切除术的调查。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6):1158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
4
Outcome of and prognostic factors for decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction.恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压性颅骨切除术的结果及预后因素
J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Apr;14(4):317-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.05.024. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
5
Decompressive hemicraniectomy in pediatric patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: case series and review of the literature.儿童恶性大脑中动脉梗死患者去骨瓣减压术:病例系列及文献复习。
World Neurosurg. 2013 Jul-Aug;80(1-2):126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
6
Predictive factors for decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction.恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压性颅骨切除术的预测因素
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 May;158(5):865-72; discussion 873. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2749-9. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
7
Assessment of outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in patients older than 60 years of age.60岁以上患者恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压性颅骨切除术后的预后评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Jun;26(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.FOCUS0958.
8
Ultra-early decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction.超早期去骨瓣减压术治疗大脑中动脉恶性梗死
Surg Neurol. 2003 Sep;60(3):227-32; discussion 232-3. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00266-0.
9
Factors predicting prognosis after decompressive hemicraniectomy for hemispheric infarction.半球梗死减压性大骨瓣开颅术后预后的预测因素。
Neurology. 2006 Sep 12;67(5):891-3. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000233895.03152.66.
10
Is decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery territory infarction of any benefit for elderly patients?减压性颅骨切除术对老年患者的大脑中动脉区恶性梗死有任何益处吗?
Surg Neurol. 2005 Aug;64(2):165-9; discussion 169. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.10.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of acute ischemic stroke (Review).减压性颅骨切除术在急性缺血性卒中治疗中的作用(综述)
Biomed Rep. 2024 Jan 3;20(2):33. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1721. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Can ACS-NSQIP score be used to predict postoperative mortality in Saudi population?ACS-NSQIP评分能否用于预测沙特人群的术后死亡率?
Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):172-175. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_734_21. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Multimodal Monitoring in Large Hemispheric Infarction: Quantitative Electroencephalography Combined With Transcranial Doppler for Prognosis Prediction.
大脑半球大面积梗死的多模态监测:定量脑电图联合经颅多普勒用于预后预测
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 8;12:724571. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.724571. eCollection 2021.
4
Is the SORT score reliable in predicting postoperative 30-day mortality after a nonemergency surgery in Saudi population?在沙特人群中,SORT评分在预测非急诊手术后30天死亡率方面是否可靠?
Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Oct-Dec;15(4):387-389. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_105_21. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
5
Outcome After Decompressive Craniectomy for Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Timing of the Intervention.大脑中动脉梗死去骨瓣减压术后的结果:干预时机。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):E318-E325. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz522.
6
Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Stroke in Older Adults: A Review.老年卒中患者的减压性颅骨切除术:综述
J Neurol Neuromedicine. 2017;2(1):1-7. doi: 10.29245/2572.942X/2017/2.942X/2017/1.1103. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
7
Changes in biopsychosocial outcomes for a mixed cohort of ICU survivors.重症监护病房(ICU)幸存者混合队列的生物心理社会结局变化。
S Afr J Physiother. 2018 Apr 10;74(1):427. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v74i1.427. eCollection 2018.
8
Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Experience from the Western Province of Saudi Arabia.恶性大脑中动脉梗死的减压性去骨瓣开颅术。沙特阿拉伯西部省份的经验。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2017 Jul;22(3):192-197. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2017.3.20170051.
9
Functional Outcome After Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Dominant or Non-Dominant Malignant Middle Cerebral Infarcts.优势侧或非优势侧大脑中恶性梗死患者减压性颅骨切除术后的功能结局
Cureus. 2017 Jan 26;9(1):e997. doi: 10.7759/cureus.997.
10
Differential Gene Expression Associated with Meningeal Injury in Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.急性轻度创伤性脑损伤中与脑膜损伤相关的差异基因表达
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Feb 15;34(4):853-860. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4479. Epub 2016 Aug 30.