Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Germany.
Injury. 2013 Aug;44(8):1015-21. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Jan 1.
Previous studies have suggested that distinct extremity injuries are associated with worse outcome following major trauma. The aim of the present study was to determine epidemiological data of extremity injuries in multiple trauma patients with respect to prevalence, injury pattern, specific mechanisms of injury and their impact on mortality.
The Trauma Register of the German Society for Trauma Surgery anonymously documents data on critically injured patients since 1993. Trauma cases documented between 2002 and 2009, older than 16 years of age and with an ISS ≥ 16 were divided into those with AIS ≥ 2 and those without a significant extremity injury. The groups were compared with respect to injury pattern, treatment characteristics and mortality.
More than half of the 24,885 patients (58.6%) had a significant extremity injury. On average patients with relevant extremity injuries sustained on average 2.1 fractures per case and 4.9% even sustained five or more extremity injuries. Fractures of the femur (16.5%), the tibia (12.6%) and the clavicle (10.4%) were the most common fractures. Patients without significant extremity injury had a significantly lower Glasgow Coma Scale at scene, a more severe brain injury and a higher 30-day- and in-hospital-mortality. In contrast, patients with significant extremity injuries had a higher rate of severe chest trauma, a higher rate of red cell blood transfusion as well a massive blood transfusion, more operative procedures and a longer ICU and in-hospital length of stay.
Multiple injured patients with and without significant extremity injuries can be regarded as two different populations with respect to early posttraumatic course and survival. Those without extremity injury had more severe head injuries and a higher mortality. However, significant extremity injury was associated with worse outcomes including a higher number of operative procedures, a higher rate of blood transfusion and a longer hospital length of stay.
既往研究表明,严重创伤后不同部位的损伤与较差的预后相关。本研究旨在确定多发伤患者的四肢损伤的流行病学数据,包括其发生率、损伤模式、具体损伤机制及其对死亡率的影响。
德国创伤外科学会创伤登记系统自 1993 年起匿名记录严重创伤患者的数据。将 2002 年至 2009 年期间记录的年龄>16 岁、ISS≥16 的创伤患者分为伴有和不伴有显著四肢损伤的两组。比较两组患者的损伤模式、治疗特点和死亡率。
超过一半(58.6%)的 24885 例患者存在显著的四肢损伤。伴有显著四肢损伤的患者平均每例发生 2.1 处骨折,4.9%的患者甚至发生 5 处或更多处四肢损伤。最常见的骨折部位是股骨(16.5%)、胫骨(12.6%)和锁骨(10.4%)。不伴有显著四肢损伤的患者在现场的格拉斯哥昏迷评分较低,脑损伤更严重,30 天死亡率和院内死亡率更高。相比之下,伴有显著四肢损伤的患者发生严重胸部创伤的比例更高,红细胞输血率和大量输血率更高,手术操作更多,入住 ICU 和住院时间更长。
伴有或不伴有显著四肢损伤的多发伤患者在早期创伤后病程和生存方面可视为两个不同的群体。不伴有四肢损伤的患者颅脑损伤更严重,死亡率更高。然而,显著的四肢损伤与更差的结局相关,包括更多的手术操作、更高的输血率和更长的住院时间。