Suppr超能文献

单腿和双腿反跳中地面反作用力不对称的比较。

Comparison of ground reaction force asymmetry in one- and two-legged countermovement jumps.

机构信息

School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Oct;27(10):2700-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280d28e.

Abstract

This study examined whether ground reaction force (GRF) asymmetry of 2-legged countermovement jumps (CMJ) is related to 1-legged CMJ asymmetry. The GRF asymmetry of a 2-legged CMJ has been suggested as a preferred test to the 1-legged CMJ for functional strength and power deficit assessment. Twenty-eight men and 30 women performed 5 trials each of a 1-legged CMJ with the right limband the left limb, and a 2-legged CMJ. Vertical GRFs were collected from each lower limb using 2 force platforms. Although several GRF variables were calculated, vertical impulse correlated most strongly with jump height in all conditions (p < 0.05), and they were used in subsequent analyses. A moderate correlation was found for impulse asymmetry between the 1- and 2-legged CMJs for women (r = 0.45, p < 0.05), but not for men (r = 0.06, p = 0.76). In contrast, cross-tabulation analyses of subjects presented with the same dominant characteristics in the 1- and 2-legged CMJs revealed poor associations for both men (Freeman-Halton exact p = 0.61) and women (Freeman-Halton exact p = 0.19). Only 11 women recorded the same dominant limb for both 1- and 2-legged CMJs. This suggests that impulse asymmetries found in the 1- and 2-legged CMJ were unrelated. As the 1-legged CMJ relies on the extension forces generated entirely from 1 limb, variations in jump heights and GRF impulses by left and right limbs separately were more indicative of functional strength differences between sides. Hence, it is recommended that the 1-legged CMJ is used when examining functional strength asymmetry in the lower limbs. In contrast, factors causing asymmetry in GRF impulses during 2-legged CMJs are more complicated and require further investigation.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨双腿反跳(CMJ)的地面反作用力(GRF)不对称性是否与单腿 CMJ 不对称性有关。GRF 不对称性已被建议作为评估功能性力量和力量不足的首选测试,用于 2 腿 CMJ。28 名男性和 30 名女性分别用右腿和左腿进行 5 次单腿 CMJ,以及 2 次双腿 CMJ。使用 2 个力台从每个下肢收集垂直 GRF。尽管计算了几个 GRF 变量,但在所有条件下,垂直冲量与跳跃高度的相关性最强(p <0.05),并在后续分析中使用了这些变量。对于女性,1 腿和 2 腿 CMJ 之间的冲量不对称性呈中度相关(r = 0.45,p <0.05),但对于男性则没有(r = 0.06,p = 0.76)。相比之下,对于在 1 腿和 2 腿 CMJ 中具有相同优势特征的受试者进行交叉表分析,发现男性(Freeman-Halton 确切概率 p = 0.61)和女性(Freeman-Halton 确切概率 p = 0.19)的相关性均较差。只有 11 名女性在 1 腿和 2 腿 CMJ 中都记录到相同的优势腿。这表明 1 腿和 2 腿 CMJ 中的冲量不对称性无关。由于 1 腿 CMJ 依赖于完全由 1 条腿产生的伸展力,因此左腿和右腿分别产生的跳跃高度和 GRF 冲量的变化更能说明两侧之间的功能性力量差异。因此,建议在检查下肢功能性力量不对称性时使用 1 腿 CMJ。相比之下,2 腿 CMJ 中导致 GRF 冲量不对称的因素更为复杂,需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验