Department of Oral Function and Rehabilitation, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Japan.
Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Mar;58(3):331-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
We compared the influence of visual feedback between spinal and trigeminal muscle activity.
Twelve subjects participated in two tasks: a finger pinch and a tooth clench task and performed a series of muscle activations with visual feedback as a training task and two series without visual feedback as pre- and post-training tasks. Five target force levels at 10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% maximal voluntary contraction were performed in each series for both tasks. During all series electromyographic (EMG) activity and force were recorded. Target force-actual force and target force-EMG curves were compared with and without visual feedback for both tasks. The variability in each series was determined as the coefficient of variation (CV) from the EMG and force recordings.
Although positive linear relationships were found between the target force level and the actual force value, and target force level and root mean square (RMS)-EMG amplitude from the tooth clenching task, the curves calculated from the finger pinch task were not completely linear. CVs of the actual force value and CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in both masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly influenced by visual feedback (P<0.001). However, the CVs of the RMS-EMG amplitude in right abductor pollicisbrevis and right first dorsal interosseous muscles were not significantly influenced by the three series.
The influence of visual feedback was different between spinally innervated and trigeminally innervated muscles, and the specific mechanism of force execution from muscle activity appears to be different between the tasks.
我们比较了脊髓和三叉神经肌肉活动之间的视觉反馈的影响。
12 名受试者参与了两项任务:手指捏合和牙齿咬紧任务,并进行了一系列肌肉激活,其中视觉反馈作为训练任务,两个系列没有视觉反馈作为预训练和后训练任务。在每个系列中,以 10%、20%、40%、60%和 80%最大自主收缩的五个目标力水平执行了两种任务。在所有系列中,记录了肌电图(EMG)活动和力。在两种任务中,比较了有和没有视觉反馈的目标力-实际力和目标力-EMG 曲线。每个系列的变异性均通过 EMG 和力记录确定为变异系数(CV)。
尽管在牙齿咬紧任务中,目标力水平与实际力值以及目标力水平与均方根(RMS)-EMG 幅度之间存在正线性关系,但从手指捏合任务计算出的曲线并非完全线性。在两种任务中,实际力值和咀嚼肌及颞肌 RMS-EMG 幅度的 CV 均受视觉反馈的显著影响(P<0.001)。然而,在三种系列中,桡侧短展肌和桡侧第一骨间背侧肌的 RMS-EMG 幅度的 CV 不受影响。
视觉反馈对脊髓和三叉神经支配的肌肉的影响不同,从肌肉活动执行力的特定机制在两种任务中似乎不同。