Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan 430030, PR China.
Respir Med. 2013 Mar;107(3):321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of intravenous and nebulized magnesium sulfate on treating adults and children with acute asthma.
Electronic literature search and the manual search of key respiratory journals were performed up to October 18, 2011. Randomized controlled trials were included if patients had been treated with intravenous or nebulized magnesium sulfate in combination with β2-agonists and were compared with the use of β2-agonists. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and the relative risks (RRs) were calculated for pulmonary functions and hospital admission respectively.
25 trials (16 intravenous, 9 nebulized) involving 1754 patients were included. In adults intravenous treatment was associated with a significant effect upon respiratory function (SMD, 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05 to 0.55; p = 0.02) but weak evidence of effect upon hospital admission (RR 0.86,95% CI 0.73 to 1.01; p = 0.06) in adults, and in children with significant effects upon both respiratory function (SMD, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.80 to 3.08; p = 0.0008) and hospital admission (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.91; p = 0.008). Nebulized treatment was associated with significant effects upon respiratory function (SMD, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.41; p = 0.009) and hospital admission (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.92; p = 0.02) in adults.
The use of intravenous magnesium sulfate, in addition to β2-agonists and systemic steroids, in the treatment of acute asthma appears to produce benefits with respect to improve pulmonary function and reduce the number of hospital admissions for children, and only improve pulmonary function for adults. However, the use of nebulized magnesium sulfate just appears to produce benefits for adults.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估静脉和雾化硫酸镁治疗成人和儿童急性哮喘的效果。
电子文献检索和关键呼吸期刊的手工检索截止到 2011 年 10 月 18 日。如果患者接受了静脉或雾化硫酸镁联合β2-激动剂治疗,并与仅使用β2-激动剂治疗进行比较,则纳入随机对照试验。分别计算肺功能和住院率的标准化均数差(SMD)和相对危险度(RR)。
纳入了 25 项试验(16 项静脉,9 项雾化),共涉及 1754 例患者。在成人中,静脉治疗与呼吸功能显著改善相关(SMD,0.30;95%置信区间(CI),0.05 至 0.55;p=0.02),但对住院率的影响证据较弱(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.73 至 1.01;p=0.06);在儿童中,静脉治疗对呼吸功能(SMD,1.94;95%CI,0.80 至 3.08;p=0.0008)和住院率(RR,0.70;95%CI,0.54 至 0.91;p=0.008)均有显著影响。雾化治疗与呼吸功能显著改善相关(SMD,0.23;95%CI,0.06 至 0.41;p=0.009)和住院率(RR,0.63;95%CI,0.43 至 0.92;p=0.02)均有显著影响。
在急性哮喘的治疗中,除了β2-激动剂和全身皮质激素外,静脉内使用硫酸镁似乎可以改善儿童的肺功能和减少住院人数,而仅改善成人的肺功能。然而,雾化硫酸镁似乎仅对成人有益。