Fletcher John L, Caterson E J, Hale Robert G, Cancio Leopoldo C, Renz Evan M, Chan Rodney K
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):168-75. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318270000f.
This study provides objective data on the practice of allograft usage in severely burned patients. Furthermore, gaps in our knowledge are identified, and areas for further research are delineated. Using an institutional review board-approved protocol, active duty military patients injured while deployed in support of overseas contingency operations and treated at our burn center between March 2003 and December 2010 were identified. Their electronic medical records were reviewed for allograft use, TBSA burned, injury severity score, anatomic distribution of burns, operative burden, length of stay, transfusions, and outcome. Among 844 patients, 112 (13.3%) received allograft and 732 (86.7%) did not. The amount of allograft used per patient varied and was not normally distributed (median, 23.5; interquartile range, 69.5). Patients received allograft skin an average of 12.75 times during their admission. Allografted patients sustained severe burns (μ, 53.8% TBSA); most were transfused (71.2%) and grafted frequently, averaging every 7.45 days. Most commonly, allograft was placed on the extremities (66.5%) followed by the trunk (44.2%); however, the vast majority of allografted patients also had concomitant burns of the head (91.1%) and hands (87.5%). All-cause mortality among the allografted patients was 19.1%. In conclusion, allograft is commonly used in the surgical treatment of severe burns. Although there are no anatomic limitations to allograft placement, there are distinct patterns of use. Given the role of allograft in the acute management of large burns, there is need for further investigation of its effect on mortality, morbidity, and antigenicity.
本研究提供了关于严重烧伤患者同种异体移植物使用情况的客观数据。此外,还明确了我们知识上的差距,并划定了进一步研究的领域。采用经机构审查委员会批准的方案,确定了2003年3月至2010年12月期间在海外执行应急行动时受伤并在我们烧伤中心接受治疗的现役军人患者。对他们的电子病历进行了审查,以了解同种异体移植物的使用情况、烧伤总面积、损伤严重程度评分、烧伤的解剖分布、手术负担、住院时间、输血情况和结局。在844例患者中,112例(13.3%)接受了同种异体移植物,732例(86.7%)未接受。每位患者使用的同种异体移植物数量各不相同,且不呈正态分布(中位数为23.5;四分位间距为69.5)。患者在住院期间平均接受同种异体皮肤移植12.75次。接受同种异体移植的患者遭受严重烧伤(平均烧伤总面积为53.8%);大多数患者接受了输血(71.2%),且频繁进行移植,平均每7.45天一次。最常见的是,同种异体移植物放置在四肢(66.5%),其次是躯干(44.2%);然而,绝大多数接受同种异体移植的患者头部(91.1%)和手部(87.5%)也有伴随烧伤。接受同种异体移植患者的全因死亡率为19.1%。总之,同种异体移植物常用于严重烧伤的外科治疗。尽管同种异体移植物的放置没有解剖学限制,但存在明显的使用模式。鉴于同种异体移植物在大面积烧伤急性处理中的作用,有必要进一步研究其对死亡率、发病率和抗原性的影响。